327 karma · joined March 24, 2017
- in the US system, treating symptoms instead of the underlying cause is easier for the doctor and more profitable in the long run.
- "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"; less patients that wait until pain is unbearable (due to its cost) which then need different treatment.
- less conflict of interest that affect what doctors prescribe
- there is only one buyer, with a strong negotiation position, potential profits are capped
Also, bear in mind that an overwhelming majority of the people who invented all this good stuff (scientists) agree that we're approaching a cliff.
in addition to that, "but what about google" is no defence for what last mile ISPs are doing. If google ever becomes too ubiquitous as a gatekeeper (it's already at that point according to the EU antitrust commission) they'll also need to be regulated.
The few protections it does offer against tampering can be achieved in a much simpler way for your scenario (signing)
Filesystems should do the same. Either pick one way and stick to it (expose it as UTF8, with a sensible normalization and collation) or offer several options that can be specified when creating a volume and do on the fly conversions for clients that need it.
One could even argue that money spent on DOD budgets trickles down less to the inhabitants of the state that raised the money in taxes in the first place compared to money spent on education.
Arguably java has a larger subset even today.
Also, there is a 5th (more likely) possibility: SA didn't find anything, but undiscovered holes do exist.
After learning about remote management capabilities I've always suspected it had holes. Large attack surface, any exploit would have a high value, and closed source.
Perhaps one day we'll be able to buy CPU's without this "feature". I'm betting AMD and ARM are in the same boat.