There is also the continued migration from rural to urban, ensuring that demand will continue to increase for a while yet.
1,178 karma · joined October 30, 2016
There is also the continued migration from rural to urban, ensuring that demand will continue to increase for a while yet.
- New construction condos are a better investment proposition than in the West because (1) there's no property tax, and (2) other types of investments are less reliable (e.g., stock market is rigged) - There's a cultural aversion to 'used' things, which explains why an investor might prefer to let a condo sit empty instead of rent it out. - Because they're seen as an investment, some new construction is actually built with the intention of selling directly to investors.
You are absolutely right that the discussion needs to be far heavier on what the concrete consequences will be, not in abstract numbers, but in how it will actually affect the lives of their children and grandchildren.
The messaging needs to be ubiquitous. Climate change should be the main topic every single damn day.
Create the table with 4x the provisioned capacity and then dial down to your nominal levels after it's been created.
Google is selling out for nothing.
When something gets harder, some percentage of people don't do it.
Purges are being applied in a way that disproportionately impacts demographics likely to vote for Democrats, by Republican state legislatures.
There is absolutely no evidence to support the premise that voter fraud is anywhere near the order of magnitude needed to make a difference in elections. It is a non-problem.
Draw your own conclusions.
Hahaha. Ahem. Hahahahaha
Source: am dedicated professional
That there is a serious counterfeiting problem is obvious to anyone who buys certain categories of products on Amazon. It is certainly obvious to Amazon itself. BUT Amazon is also a very customer focused company. So how has this not been solved?
Critics will speculate that Amazon makes more money with this status quo, thus has little incentive to fix things. But that calculus doesn't make any sense---maybe in a very narrow balance sheet view, but Amazon has always taken a long view on these things, and there's no way the long term damage to their brand is worth whatever they make from sketchy third-party sellers. It doesn't add up. There must be something else factored in that I'm missing.
Edit: so they don't use lidar... Is this a machine vision failure, then?