801 karma · joined July 10, 2021
I'm not a lawyer but I could be. I'm not a banker but I could be. I'm not a programmer but I could be.
lobo@lmllr.com
Due to the small size of apartments, finding places to work, study, or read outside the cramped family home is a significant challenge. This is also why love hotels exist.
Starbucks, however, has no such policies, making it extremely popular for these activities. I always wonder how they manage with such low spending per occupied seat.
Additionally, Starbucks service quality in Japan is exceptional. The staff is friendly, and regular customers receive incredible attention to brighten their day with a smile.
Granted all of these have things wrong (LH C is ancient and has no privacy, UA staff is hit and miss, ANA is mostly excellent).
I don’t like changing planes in the desert thus the Arabian ones are off the plate…
The initiative is entirely private. ISPs and copyright holders are collaborating to save legal costs.
Boohoo government censorship is totally inappropriate here ;)
And I doubt they shot them.
Also - the Soviet PoWs in the camps would like to have a word with you.
Also please don't tell me k8s it. Way too heavy.
I run a few applications on a souped-up Raspi (paperless-ngx, jellyfin, some postgres dbs). I can't see why this would improve things. :)
Honest question.
He should have cut 25% of the workforce to get started (and killed the dividend).
Also - the European expansion and Ohio projects, while good short-term strategies, were too early.
Cut the ship down to size and force existing sites to refocus or be closed. Get alarmist. Make sure you cut out all the bad apples. Prune the tree. Be ruthless and determined.
They should hire Reed Hastings now. He's the OG turnaround king.
Dropping Pat will alleviate their feeling of having to do "something."
As for M&A, it wouldn't just have to be approved at the DoJ. And the Chinese will never ever approve of it (but would have to). If they do a transaction without approval from the CMA, it would be like a nuclear financial war.
I think it's high time to gut intel into parts, a la GE. Sell the Fabless to QCOM or BCOM. Sell the Fabs of one by one to GF, Tower, UMC or even tsmc. Find a PE firm for the leading edge and reconstrue it with significant rnd credits as a kind of Bell labs 2.0.
Or something like that.
Given infinite time and compute - maybe the approach is significantly better. But that’s just not practical. So unless you see dramatic shifts - no one is going to throw away proven results on your new approach because of the TTM penalty if it goes wrong.
The EDA industry is (has to be) ultra conservative.
Do you have children?
The whole purpose of this is only to give parents a reason to say no. Often, a single kid in a class with an unrestricted iPhone is enough to poison the well. Now it's much, much simpler. Kids understand when you say it's against the law.
As a sibling comment notes, multi-product wafers are a theoretical answer. However, since you have process corners (manufacturing defects aren't uniformly distributed on the wafer), it is unfeasible for anything but the cheapest parts.
The real next moonshot in the foundry business would be to lower the respin costs, i.e., the amount of money it costs when your fabbed first silicon doesn't yield or validate functionally in the way you had expected/planned.
If I were the US government (or any other), I'd focus on that. Subsidize the respin cost to zero in the short-term, given certain prerequisites for start-ups, and push an all-out Manhatten project RnD effort to lower the respin cost in the long run.
Your other points may be valid.
They truly had something unique when they started - but instead of polishing the product with enough VC runway to either find an exit or grow into a real consumer driven utility like Grammarly - they tried their hand at a B2B play.
From then on, their software integration sucked (browser plugins, etc.), their file translation sucked, and their “sass” shenanigans reached adobe levels.
Why can’t Germans do software?