lo_fye

Maybe you should do some research before calling bullsh*t. Here’s part 1 of 6 of a 12 hour analysis of that film - https://overcast.fm/+DkjFY8nxA

The hosts go into it open minded, and come out believing it is real.

Along the way they speak to the surviving people who were actually there and involved, AND to a Hollywood film maker and creature FX person who was making high-end costumes in the 60s. He says the technology to make a costume that good at that time was not in existence. Furthermore, he says nobody has yet been able to produce a costume of similar quality.

Also, when you look into the proportions the human body, they don’t match those of the being in the film.

Also, there are many indications in the film itself that it was an impromptu shoot.

AND the guy who claimed to have been the man in the monkey suit had a beef (motive) with the man who shot the film, AND the costume he described wearing doesn’t match what appears on the film, AND the lengths of his limbs don’t match those of the creature in the film.

And the other guy who was present when the film was shot is known to be highly respected and full of integrity. A real straight shooter.

Lastly, check out BFRO.org to see the thousands of sightings that continue to occur every year across the USA. Sure, some are probably bears... but some are up close and personal, and involve police, forest rangers, military, etc.

Watch YouTube videos by Dr Jason Fung. He cures type 2 diabetes with diet.

If you have enough money to last 5 years, and nothing really tying you down, absolutely quit and follow your passion!

Trade definite boredom for potential adventure & success!

Not moreso than .txt

That memo was by Gates/Ballmer. Satya Nadella has a completely different strategy. 2018 is a very different time, strategy-wise. Microsoft is transitioning from platforms to platform less supporting technologies (.Net core, Azure, OneDrive, etc), and Github is a major one.

I found the daily interactions and increased participation in strategy to be great... BUT I never felt productive. As a dev, it was easy to know when I was productive. I could FEEL productive. As a manager? Not so much. There was nothing tangible. Just meetings and documents, and comments from direct reports. After 2.5 years, I just went back to development.

TL;DR - spend time configuring it, write efficient code, and understand what your 3rd party code is actually doing.

PHP is the day before yesterday's software, but it still gets a shitload of profitable work done.

Old man yells at cloud

They didn't setup an admin account and disable ex-employees' access. How is this Mucrosoft's fault?

Oh, yes, I like that much more :) I've created this as an issue on their github repo, at https://github.com/css-modules/css-modules/issues/24

"The composes keyword says that .normal includes all the styles from .common" -- great, except you have the meaning of the word reversed. In the context above it actually means ".normal is part of .common", which is clearly not the intent. If you wanted it to mean that ".normal includes all the styles from .common" then .normal should be "composedOf: common"

No, how about a museum (of antiquities we no longer require)

Be careful of what you say here... it could get you put on a no fly list, or result in your website evapourating.

"The issue was centered around an update that was pushed 4 days ago" - that's an app bug, not an iPad bug.

Looks like XML implemented as JSON. If you want that much structure, use XML.

the generic term for "tumbleweed houses" is "tiny homes" or "tiny houses". there's also a couple in New York? who built a great house out of a shipping container.

They should write a framework. You learn a lot that way, and it helps you determine what you need from a good framework in future.

Hilariously, all 3 "unique" MAC addresses in that marketing image are identical: 00-14-22-01-23-45

They changed the font colour of the word "Mac", but not the actual address. Plus, Mac should be MAC.

McFail.

We have a chapter in London Ontario Canada, too! http://awesomelondon.ca

I contacted Netflix about this on twitter. They say it ain't so. https://twitter.com/lo_fye/statuses/357851185140596736

The film "resonance: beings of frequency" says it is from RF noise like cellular & wi-fi. We can't hear it, but it is there, and if you put a 2.4Ghz phone beside a hive, the bees vacate. Perhaps higher intensities kill them?

I had this same problem recently. I thought co-working would fix it, but it didn't. Like you, the problem was deeper; I missed shared goals, successes, and even failures.

How did I fix it? I quit. I loved my job and my boss and my work hours, compensation, benefits & vacation... but I quit anyway. In January I start work at a small highly collaborative company, and I feel SO good about it :)

They can't lose what they never earned.

Scott Forstall, not Steve.

I guess it's the difference between: a) blogging your thoughts about an article and linking back to it, which encourages people to read the original so they know the context for what you've written.

VERSUS

b) quoting all or almost all of the interesting bits from the article, and providing a link to the original.

In the latter case, there is no reason or incentive for the user to visit the source. In the past couple of years I've begun to think this is the wrong way to go about things.

i guess they could put a hoverbar at the top of the page when they link to the original content. if there's a 404 or redirect, the user can click the hoverbar to see gimmebar's copy.

i'm not sure how to do it, exactly, but i know it's possible to do this in a way that isn't so... swipey.

Gimmebar pulls a Readability. When you share content from Gimmebar, it shares a shortlink to the content on Gimmebar, not the source URL. Sure seems like content/value/traffic theft to me.

it better be a very simple web app. otherwise the applicant can only apply to a couple jobs a week/month.

makes me think: ask a car manufacturer to design & build a new car before you choose them to design & build your company's custom car.

Is he still the majority shareholder? Does this make him accountable to the board, now? Maybe he did it both for the $, and as a show of goodwill toward the board, after that whole "Kiss my butt, we're buying Instagram" thing.