At this point in time, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that consciousness is deterministic. If you disagree, you'll need to provide concrete proof to the contrary.
532 karma · joined September 22, 2012
At this point in time, the overwhelming majority of evidence indicates that consciousness is deterministic. If you disagree, you'll need to provide concrete proof to the contrary.
It's not a stretch to imagine someone acting on that information with potentially dangerous results; taking extra unneeded supplements, having elective surgery, dramatically changing their lifestyle to reduce the risk of some condition, etc.
What did they expect him to say? It WAS only a clock. There were no other details regarding its nature or use.
I see things like this all the time and it really puts me off OSS.
I'm not willing to throw away my device's resale value to block a physical compromise attack.
I've had this exact same thing ever since I was a young child. It's gotten a bit better as I've grown older, but I used to get pretty severe insomnia from the fear that my "self" would be destroyed when I lost consciousness and the "self" that awoke would simply be a perfect duplicate.
It's like getting angry at software companies because they're not spending all their profits on solving climate change. The existence of a problem doesn't mean that the entirety of society and technological progress must pause until it's solved.
What is the argument you are attempting to make? Let's start there and see where we can go, yes?
Here's the same hypothetical that you're proposing from another angle: "If banning whistleblowing is doomed to failure irrelevant of one's stance on its morality, then should not the same be true of war crimes?"