What would your customers need to make them want to pay for it ?
26 karma · joined May 1, 2014
Blog: kshitijbanerjee.com Email me at ksh.dce@gmail.com, I won’t bite.
What would your customers need to make them want to pay for it ?
So far no, but in the future with more specific and enterprise suitable tooling - likely
So how does one get published, enough to get into a good PhD program?
I wonder whether the problem is that its landed on an incorrect output sample (i.e re-sampling another code output would fix it ) .. vs … a feedback loop on the compiler output is what it really needs ..
Have you tried any of these agent based workflows that claim to be able to loop with some amount of reasoning ?
However as I was researching, there are a few interesting ideas in this space that might help these LLM's solve more complex problems in the future. Post here if interested: https://kshitij-banerjee.github.io/2024/04/30/can-llms-produ...
Main reason: a) to find the right code, I have to keep sampling it, and b) it doesn't seem to be able to solve larger / more complex problems that I actually find more need for.
I found some interesting research on combining planning-algorithms for complex problems, and some ideas on guiding the LLM's decoding process towards correctness by optimizing it via reward functions and reducing the search space. I've detailed and summarised the main points in the post above.
Questions:
1) Do you find code LLM's really useful? Please share some stories / examples where they help vs they didn't. I'm trying to form a better understanding they are just fancy, vs actually productive and useful to most
2) Any other research ideas being pursued in this field ? / what are you trying ?
Does anyone pay for this ? how does this compare to other products ? what made you build this ?
Both Go and Rust, and wasm are new to me - so i'm wondering about whether one is superior to the other.
I think figma has a lot of feature, and penpot seems a great replica of it, but I'm not too sure if the SVG + Clojurescript is a great way to build it..
I'm really looking for the core figma feature set to build. 1. Ability to have a canvas with zooms / freedom to create elemnets 2. Components and instances, and tree structured layers 3. Autolayout + CSS options. Frames and Pages
I think with the above 3, there's a viable basic feature set that would get one off the ground.
I did try the figma plugin apis, to extend native figma capabilities - but there's a limit to things you can do with it and it's getting to a point where more investment in the figma plugin seems a bit wasteful
Wasm seems appropriate. Why Go, instead of Rust ?
Rather than so many different versions of flawed product. I wonder how things would work out if a lot of creative individuals solved and made better the same problem.
Also, I think another pain point is that webcam and audio setup is tricky to most `windows` pc average user, is there a product that helps figure out the quality score of your setup and potentially help with it ?
Reminds me of a 3D 2048 game I made some years back.
https://kshitij-banerjee.github.io/Cubiks-2048/
Check the dismember view I provided (space bar). That open up the cube to give a better spatial understanding of the board.
That is the problem with 3D games, I realized. Trying to visualize is a pain to most people and deviates them from the game. This was my attempt at solving that.
I think in your case, hovering over a cell and highlighting its adjacent numbers might help create better visual understanding of the state.
What's wrong with that ? I fail to understand ? If you start putting everything into your brain, you'll soon go mad. A regular cleanup of the information in your brain to retain only what's relevant for your survival is okay. It's best such things are left googleable. What is the use of keeping in memory the capital of australia, when that trivia contributes a total `0` to do what you do.
If you keep doing, implementing and executing stuff that you are passionate about, I think you'll keep learning. Only thing is that we become more focussed as adults about our interests, than we are as children (inquisitive about everything).