https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/aduhelm-again
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/goodbye-aduhelm
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/alzheimer-s-and-in...
179 karma · joined February 6, 2020
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/aduhelm-again
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/goodbye-aduhelm
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/alzheimer-s-and-in...
Ok, maybe we’re just arguing different points here. I’ll grant that amyloids have something to do with all of this. I’m having a more difficult time understanding why one would suggest these drugs to a diagnosed Alzheimer’s patient at a point where it can no longer help.
Or is the long term thought that drugs like these will eventually be used a lot earlier as a prophylactic to those at high risk?
“Derek Lowe has worked on drug discovery for over three decades, including on candidate treatments for Alzheimer’s. He writes Science’s In The Pipeline blog covering the pharmaceutical industry.
“Amyloid is going to be — has to be — a part of the Alzheimer’s story, but it is not, cannot be a simple ‘Amyloid causes Alzheimer’s, stop the amyloid and stop the disease,'” he told Big Think.
“Although the effect of the drug will be described as being about a third, it consists, on average, of a difference of about 3 points on a 144-point combined scale of thinking and daily activities,” Professor Paresh Malhotra, Head of the Division of Neurology at Imperial College London, said of donanemab.
What’s more, lecanemab only improved scores by 0.45 points on an 18-point scale assessing patients’ abilities to think, remember, and perform daily tasks.
“That’s a minimal difference, and people are unlikely to perceive any real alteration in cognitive functioning,” Alberto Espay, a professor of neurology at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, told KFF Health News.
At the same time, these potentially invisible benefits come with the risk of visible side effects. Both drugs caused users’ brains to shrink slightly. Moreover, as many as a quarter of participants suffered inflammation and brain bleeds, some severe. Three people in the donanemab trial actually died due to treatment-related side effects.”
https://bigthink.com/health/alzheimers-treatments-lecanemab-...
And here’s a Lowe follow-up on hard data released later:
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/lilly-s-alzheimer-...
At what point do all of the accumulated errors in training make it so that all models are doing is hallucinating based on all of the flawed training data? Do we need to hire a bunch of humans to accurately classify the first couple of levels of what the models are ingesting or something similar, and would anyone actually pay for that to happen?
https://theamazingworldofgumball.fandom.com/wiki/Awesome_Sto...
Is it any wonder that depressed and schizophrenic people smoke?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946180/
Edit: er, sorry, you were probably talking about Buspar, not nicotine in regards to dopamine. Buspar does increase seratonin and dopamine, both of which are tickled to varying degrees by nicotine.
Buspar works in smoking cessation therapy as it helps balance the drop in serotonin when quitting smoking.
The Curve of Binding Energy is a fascinating study of Theodore Taylor, the engineer behind the smallest nuke warhead in the world, and his concerns that terrorists may be able to build warheads themselves.
Pretty much any McPhee book or article is fascinating. His book Oranges is all about farming oranges, processing orange juice so it can sit in refrigerated vats for months (and how it is reconstituted through "flavor packs" that give it back the OJ flavors after long storage) and all kind of other orange stories. No matter what rabbit hole McPhee jumps down, his research and writing are nothing short of engrossing.
TL;DR: Traditional college maybe made sense before college debt became an albatross around college grad's necks. Time to find more reasonable alternatives for those that don't want that albatross.
I used to feel that way strongly. All of this made sense when most people could go to a state school and earn their way through with little or no loans. Today being a well rounded student with some great friends and a bit of independent living at a state school is likely to still saddle you with a 6 figure loan.
So even though I really thing the above is the right way for people to pursue an education / career after high school, it simply makes little sense for a lot of students. To the end I'd really like to see more institutions like WGU that allow you to get through school a lot more cheaply by doing everything remotely and measuring outcomes rather than measuring grades and the number of classes you took. And somehow we need to convince employers that colleges like WGU are the best alternative for a lot of really talented potential employees.
She's a great doc.
Politicians use the books for fundraising and can end up with a lot of surplus books. I suspect that the donors that purchased Clinton's book needed to free up some garage / warehouse space and dumped them when they were no long a useful political tool.
What I try to stress to people who ask is that ketamine is a powerful agent of neuroplasticity. So, so many people expect to take a pill and just feel better. With ketamine, you have to stay as positive as you can before, during and for days afterwards to reprogram your brain to be more positive. The people that I know that have had success with ketamine are those that either had therapists working with them during or right after the experience, or those who followed the "must work hard at being positive for 2-3 days after taking ketamine" advice.
This is a med that I suspect you could actually damage yourself permanently if you just take the med and then go right back to doomscrolling social media or something similarly negative. The initial experience can make you feel better for a day or two, which is huge because no other antidepressant has that kind of quick impact. But if you work at it during that 2-3 days after, you can become a more positive person permanently.
I'm hoping that it gets more accepted over time and can be prescribed by psychiatrists because compared to most other "here's some pills, hopefully you'll feel better in 6 weeks and if not, we'll give you more pills that will hopefully work in 6 weeks" depression meds, it works really fast. For someone on the verge of suicide, it can be a truly miracle med.
[0]:https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9af9771d-74cd-49f3-88e3-f3...
[1]:http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/11922/Pavur%20et%20al%20A%20tal...
[2]:https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6e4194fa-474b-41cb-81fa-db...
[3]:https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/publications/date/James.Pavur...
Note: I'm not associated with Dr. Pavur in any way other than being fascinated by some of his papers and Defcon presentations.
I found that one just after spending all day chasing an odd WAN issue for a customer. A few years ago in the era of half/full duplex in ethernet, duplex mismatches sometimes manifested in some truly weird ways. It was at that point that I did start to believe in ghosts. At least ghosts in the network.
In my defense, I was trying to vaguely reference the Problem with Popplers episode of Futurama but failed.