> When you play the sound, the start is at the bottom of the image, and then moves upwards (kind of like Guitar Hero)
In this case Y-axis is time, no?
937 karma · joined July 30, 2022
In this case Y-axis is time, no?
Then, after answering this question, ask yourself - is blogging the best way to achieve the goal? This is what led me to delete the small blog I had and concentrate on better things.
With regards to how you find other interesting things to read - nowadays mostly by marginalia search [1]. I've found that I rarely want to read more than one or few posts from a specific blog. Most blogs are not narrow enough and you find a lot of different subjects covered. So it might be better to specifically look for things you are interested in, rather than follow all articles in a blog by a concrete author.
Godspeed.
Exercise: Pick a topic and talk about it for 5 minutes in front of a recording camera on your computer (on a Mac QuickTime can do this). Then watch how you look and sound, notice the things you don't like, adjust them, and iterate.
Why did you single out frequentists here? This is a challenge for all inference, prediction, classification, and any other "forecasting".
To me the "addendum" was the low point of the article. Because it turned what might have been a principled position into a semi-coherent rant about politics, former US president, climate change, and "Muskrat", which in it self resembles the worst kind of twitter threads.
I don't understand why people do these things, but just like twitter - your post would also be better without this type of stuff. Just personal opinion.
To end on a positive note - I like your apps and the spartan css style of the blog. So this is a friendly message :)
The author blames twitter for negativity and arguments, but spent quite some time on his post criticising the new Twitter ownership and then went on a rant about Elon Musk. How is that better.
Is the idea here that people should express their criticisms on blogs rather than tweets? But blogs have to be shared on some kind of social media to be read by others too (like this on on HN).
I would agree more with the message of "do what you like and don't go around telling others what they should be doing". Doesn't matter the platform. If everyone practiced this then most problems with social media would go away.
And the reply also leaves me with a similar impression:
> your training objective can be different at train and test time
But this is not overfitting, this is concept drift, a different and well-defined thing in ML.
> the datapoints you use can be different at train and test time
Both train and test data came from the same population. They are just different incomplete random samples.
I guess what I am getting at - overfitting happens because we know we are training a model on an incomplete representation of the whole. But that representation is not a proxy, as suggested in the article - it is not slightly different to the goal. It's an incomplete piece of the goal.
Many many small changes had to happen before it downgraded into what we see today [0].
We even had a "Black Lives Matter" rally here, when things were happening in USA. Media reported on it, mostly Lithuanian teens showed up, some skipped school to attend. I don't think there was a single black person. They even had some signs against police brutality, when in Lithuania most of incidents happen not by police but to police.
I assume for chrome it also works, but only for people who more or less live in the browser.
2. Disable retweets - end to the "aggregator" accounts.
3. Disable likes - end to vanity posting.
4. Adjust the ranking algorithm - users who post a lot and use a lot of hashtags are downweighted.
The goal would be is to make twitter a platform for people to share updates about their work. Artist share their paintings, scientists their articles, developers - the new versions of their software, etc.
This would kill twitter thou.
I don't see any issue - both can talk about England and provide different perspectives.
One that stuck with me is the "discovery" of atoms. Some philosopher (don't remember the name) in Greece was thinking about the volume of a pyramid. And he imagined what would happen if we dissected the pyramid through the middle and looked at two squares formed on the bases. He reasoned that the squares should have equal areas, however if that was the case for every such dissection the pyramid would never form and instead we would have a cube.
So his reasoning was that in order to explain this paradox objects in the real world should be composed of small elements, so that after dissection the squares are slightly different.
What am I missing?
4. It's hard to understand and appreciate the advice without experiencing the situation first.
Maybe there is a lesson here somewhere.
You should listen to the linked video for a better introduction.
You can listen to some quotes from the book here: https://web.archive.org/web/2oe_/http://wayback-fakeurl.arch...
"This single stick, which you now behold ingloriously lying in that neglected corner, I once knew in a flourishing state in a forest." - A Meditation Upon a Broom-Stick, Jonathan Swift, 1701.
"'What is Truth?' said jesting Pilate; and would not stay for an answer." - Of Truth, Francis Bacon, 1625
"The devil is a citizen of every country, but only in our own are we in constant peril of an introduction to him." - Disintroductions, Ambrose Bierce, 1902
"Human being are curious creatures, and in nothing more curious than in the forms of diversion which they devise for themselves." - Evening Parties, Rose Macaulay, 1926
"The effort which people put up to avoid thinking might almost enable them to think and to have some new ideas." - Symmetry and Repetition, Lewis Namier, 1941
"The other day a cousin of mine was married; thought what God or myself had to do with it I do not know, but I was obliged to go to church." - The Sterner Sex, Rebecca West, 1913
"Sometimes it is so hard to criticize, one wants only to chronicle.", Bad Poets, Randall Jarrell, 1953
I don't know any javascript, but this is my attempt at modification:
let domains = "twitter\.com|\
cnn.com\
";
(function(){
'use strict';
var links = document.getElementsByClassName("titlelink");
var owners = [];
for (var link of links) {
if (link.href.match(domains)) {
owners.push(link.closest(".athing"));
}
}
for (var owner of owners) {
owner.nextSibling.remove();
owner.remove();
}
})();