kasparsklavins

Although it has a valid use case, most of the time I interact with annotations is when trying to pause a video and ending up being redirected to some other video or a 3rd party site.

Even services that "allegedly" advertise they have that, still require manually clicking every day combination.

I'd fly more often if it was easy. The few times I tried, it would be just faster to drive than go through all possible 900+ day combinations.

* Accessibility is 0. Cant open external links in a new tab. None of my navigation shortcuts work.

Still yet to have a day where I havent had a 500 error on gitlab cloud.

In quizzes like these its usually assumed the worst possible scenario/dataset.

Asking to do a pull request or create an issue is just a polite way of saying fuck off.

Would this call for more regulations?

Private organisations/companies? Less likely. Would they even have the ability to do a build from the source code?

Another way to get rid of "unwelcome individuals" is to provide rehabilitation, more opportunities, etc. This is better in the long term.

Source: I'm European.

What I meant was what @AstralStorm said about mathematical and logic proofs that it works for all defined values.

To prove it works with all possible inputs, there are other tools at your disposal.

I'll take the license.

Users won't notice when something is perfect. But when anything is misaligned, it sticks out like a sore thumb.

Dont give up, we care about the pixel.

I like the solution of not showing the navbar unless the user scrolls up.

IMO, fixed navbars are almost as bad as popups.

We would not have charge our phones every day and laptops would last for longer if anyone cared about how much their application consumes. It's ridiculous.

Good engineering isn't just about features.