543 karma · joined December 31, 2016
"The day's headlines delivered to you without bullshit."
Prompt: "Spit about the oppression of cats by dogs!"
> Lives of cats, constantly threatened
> Oppression by dogs, never ended
> Victims of their brutality and hate
> Excluded, mistreated, and dominated, their fate.
> — PoetGPT, https://poetgpt.koll.ai
- Your app exclusively uses your company’s own account setup and sign-in systems.
- Your app is an education, enterprise, or business app that requires the user to sign in with an existing education or enterprise account.
- Your app uses a government or industry-backed citizen identification system or electronic ID to authenticate users.
- Your app is a client for a specific third-party service and users are required to sign in to their mail, social media, or other third-party account directly to access their content.
A better way would be a global ban coordinated among every nation, and even then that would be difficult to pull off.
This seems a lot cleaner than the alternative. Sure the devs have greater responsibility, but there's no dev/ops disconnect here.
the only thing I like is how they aren't actually associated with Tor in any way... lol...
"The lawsuit moves against multiple defendants: Bitcoin.com, Roger Ver, Bitmain Inc. Bitmain Technologies LTD. Bitmain Technologies Holding Company, Jihan Wu, The Kraken LLC, Jesse Powell, Amaury Sechet, Shammah Chancelor and Jason Cox. This legal action will seek to prove that specific key actors, including some of the biggest US-based and international names and entities in the digital currency world, have been operating with the support of the Chinese government to centralize the Bitcoin cash network resulting in Chinese entities now having established dominance over this important segment of the cryptocurrency market with proprietary software checkpoints and instituting other means of control over the system."
The lawsuit is almost equally vague, talking about "hijacking the Bitcoin Cash network, centralizing the market, and violating all accepted standards...". Later on the lawsuit document goes into the ABC/SV split and how this has led to a lower value for both chains.
The plantiff is apparently some company behind "the development of a low cost, rapid deployment solution for operation of cryptocurrency mining – the BlockchainDome. The BlockchainDome is a passive “cooling ground-coupled heat-exchanger"..." basically sounds like they use excess energy from chimneys to mine bitcoin (and bitcoin cash)
They're underpowered, but if you're just SSHing into a remote box it's a good choice.
The fact that Monsanto (roundup maker) is incredibly unpopular doesn't help their case either...
then when you sell the btc for usd, you pay the capital gains tax (probably 15%, it depends) on the difference from the price it was accepted at, and the price it was sold at