1,343 karma · joined September 7, 2015
It's also something that's easy to do if you start from the beginning treating your CI/CD system as something that just runs scripts out of your repo.
Everything flat and thin catches the wind. That's physics.
The reason solar panels don't go blowing around is that we spend money and engineering effort to prevent this from happening. You know what else generally doesn't go blowing around? Sails from boats. Same reason: Because they're well attached to a strong structure.
And here's a frequently quoted study showing that the US is much closer to an oligopoly than pluralistic democracy: http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/GilensPage2014.pdf
So, the definition and evidence say, yes.
Building a solar roof is going to be orders of magnitude cheaper, and the pipes wouldn't generate electricity.
Areas of the central valley are legendary for strong winds. A large stretch of the aqueduct (200km?) runs along the valley's West edge. So does the interstate highway I5.
The I5 has frequent high wind advisories. In the area around Pacheco Pass there are frequently gusting cross winds between 55 and 70km per hour. I use the I5 as my reference here, because I have spent many hours of my life driving it in these conditions.
> If your comment is true, wouldn't all warehouses using the same type of standard "bents" also be very expensive?
What makes you think building a warehouse in earthquake country is cheap?
> For all of the things I have read about large commercial solar panel installations, never once did I read anything about the risk of wind tearing off PV panels. If this were really a serious threat, wouldn't we see regularly local news stories about large PV panels "flying" away in big wind storms? And, yet, I never saw one.
The statement about solar panels making very good sails obviously true. Everything thin and flat makes a good sail.
PV panels don't go flying away because people spend a lot of money attaching them to the ground. They're expensive systems, and any installer that didn't make sure they were bolted down effectively, would be sued out of business after the first windstorm.
The term "hallucination" feels much more like anthropomorphizing. The word hallucination implies an aberrant condition. A much better term would be "confabulation".
You don't trust things or individuals that confabulate.
Individual sales are in the thousands, so they operate more like high-end jewelry stores than a "normal" business. One sale a day is minimum 250K/year.
The store itself seems to be more of just a show room. There are other sales routes too. Selling into hotels would be an example. There are also maintenance services, so a high end rug in some sense can be seen as a recurring revenue source.
It's a interesting little corner.
Got any documentation for that? The most precise location I can find is "Mexico".
What I've heard is that the lettuce from many farms goes through the same industrial lettuce shredders. The shredders were contaminated by at least one farm's produce, and then the shredders spread the Cyclospora to lettuce from other farms.
There's a good podcast covering this event: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-natural-causes-340763248...
* Jimmy Carter * Bill Clinton * Barak Obama
It's kind of a bad example, because there are other reasons that we don't have HUDsin cars.
A friend of mine designed car interiors. His explanation went like this:
With a HUD, you have to pick a focus point.
In an airplane, when you look forward, your eyes are always focused at infinity, so the HUD is focused there. It has the same focus point as your eyes.
In a car everything is slower and closer, so you have to constantly change your focus.
The HUD though has a single focus point though, and drivers' eyes tend to lock onto the HUD's focus. This focus lock interferes with normal scanning, and drivers stop seeing important things. They don't notice important things, so they get into accidents.
According to him, HUDs in cars lead to much higher accident rates.