jsprogrammer

Anyone know what "brains" are being run on YouTube?

There is harm from the association, if the association is not accurate.

>They don't seem to be involved in any other way but "NASA Eagleworks Laboratories" makes it sound like official NASA organization.

If the NASA name is being used unofficially in such a public manner, wouldn't NASA do something about it?

Not a proof.

Cards should be easy to pull.

Things are tightening up.

I doubt WikiLeaks wants them. Know how to make a Gmail account public?

Maybe I could crowd source people to clean up all the spam?

DNC could have gone open source at anytime.

They choose not to.

Just as I was sending something to Katie Couric, too.

Clearly, knowing the "local" time of your friend's wakening is critical.

>"X said Y but there is no evidence for this"

That is not a known falsehood. It is just speculation.

Sarcasm is an excellent genre for short texts.

The end of the article states that everything it discussed prior is only part of a "toy". It is known that the toy being studied does not fully correspond to our universe.

If the sources were reliable, it wouldn't be slander.

Also a strong case for large punitive damages.

Lyft puts out a carrot and then fucks you for profit?

No jury will put up with that (neither will Lyft's settlement team).

It doesn't matter when the company contradicts their fine print.

Seriously, did you look at the screenshots?

Known falsehoods are facts that should be reported.

Doesn't "If they want it you should build it" already assume "if you build it they will come"?

If you don't think they will come, why are you doing it?

"We are expressing to Justice, our view, that no charges are appropriate in this case." - Comey

Those points should be given airtime as they are destroyed in public and the responsible parties brought to justice.

Censorship is never the answer.

I think what it means is that (C) data was removed from a documented and transmitted.

The first comment linked to it[0]?

[0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597800

I don't think you watched Comey's presentation. He said that Clinton should not be prosecuted (ie. no conviction).

NNs/ANNs/DNNs/xNNs have already[0] been framed as easily fooled.

[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1897.pdf

Yes. The how and why in this case are pretty much the same thing however. Why does a program do what it does? Because a physical machine is running a distinct code.

According to the article, anyone can negotiate for a raise at any time. All you have to do is execute the negotiation process.

Or a 20 hour work-week with full salary.

Yes, I thought the meaning of obsessed was clear. The poster was referring to people who are preoccupied with (presumably, `others'`) community contract negotiations.

What is so strange about it? If a theory is not and cannot be tested, it is not science by definition.

That doesn't mean the theory is not valuable, just that you need a different word to describe it. If a theory may become testable in the future, but is not currently, meta-science seems as good as any other term.

Not necessarily. Java byte code can be run directly on a JPM (Java Physical Machine).

Reddit has multiple payment bots. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/changetip/

I believe there are Twitter bots for the same. Any bot should be generalizable to any text medium.