johnsmith21006

Classroom is paid for and not ad driven.

Totally agree in consumer space. School docs, team roosters, anything was MS forever and basically overnight I only get personal stuff in Google Apps. But work stuff still dominated by MS but some slight cracks.

Personally prefer Google Apps now.

Btw, kids school they have to use Google as workflow including plagiarism check all based on Google Apps. Pretty amazing and had thought MS Office monopoly unbreakable.

You are free to use something else. Google does some things better so people use. Gmail Google solved spam and unlimited storage and won. We should encourage companies to do things better.

Look at Google Photos now being far better so winning. This is how it is suppose to work.

What? Teachers love Classroom and why they pay to use. Something does not dominate as quickly as Google has in k12 unless very good. People do not lime change.

What? Google provided a far better solution to our schools that is more efficient in every aspect. They listened and stepped up. Not a good thing?

Tim Cook is that you? Really this line is rather ridiculous. Google charges per month per child for the software.

CB are not subsidized and schools pay for Google software recurring per kid.

Google Classroom is not free and schools pay per recurring per kid.

Missing why? Linux free and very efficient. Why?

Completely disagree. Google has far more data including mapping data that FB does not have. A key aspect is FB only has curated data where Google gets all your data.

I would never share my searches on FB. Google photos has all my photos and FB what willing to share. Then YT has over 1 billion hours a day viewed which is 19x more than FB video and growing faster.

What has happened to HN? This thread is so filled with misinformation it is clear there is very little understanding of container.

A container is just a process. Really no different than any other. So cache and shared libraries, etc all the same with just a little care.

Containers are simply processes so NOT 1% overhead! No overhead but get hard to believe.

What? I personally had many viruses and malware on Windows and never personally had a single one on Android.

Agree and why these latest "tech" companies that do NOT actually sell their tech will not fall as easily from industry changes.

I have a tough time seeing the new three, Google, Amazon and FB going away. I can see it with MS and Apple.

The reason Spanner was possible is because Google does NOT use standard TCP/IP. Google created a logical circuit switch network that is determinate versus IP nondeterminat.

Do realize Apple also has over $100b of debt and Google about $4b.

"would raise the company’s adjusted debt to more than $100bn."

https://www.ft.com/content/d0293136-e98b-11e6-893c-082c54a7f...

Supplier sent advertly sent not Waymo (Google)

I want one but not sure why.

You forgot ChromeOS taking from MS. Grew over 35% last year while Windows and OS X bith declined.

This is a great idea. Google is like on Aderall lately.

Agree. Publishing research is a more accurate way and removes the fact the two companies fundamentally view pattents differently.

Think this article misses a fundamental difference between Google and Apple and that is fundamentally the two view patents differently.

I do not think it is a BSD kernel.

Totally agree on the comparison to Trump. Thought this for a while and never said it. Interesting see the same. Listen to an earnings call.

But the biggest was when TC went on CNBC Cramer and insisted China was going great to find out China was a disaster.

The other was during quiet time he ended up taking a tour of the trading floor right next to were CNBC was broadcasting live. They were like Tim why are here? He said he was talking a tour with his nephew.

Tim went on and on how the AirPods are the biggest product Apple has ever had.

I can not imagine Kalanick surviving.

More likely reskin Android than BSD. Minimum Linux kernel.

I do not think based on FreeBSD. Most likely Linux kernel and decent chance Android.

Why does Microsoft not find and instead Google? MS is not a startup and it is their code. Seems weird that Google has to fine their issues.

What does this say about using Google software versus software from Microsoft? Or am I missing something obvious?

Trump

Google owns a decent chunk of CloudFlare. They shared the flaw as they should last week.

I see nothing close to Google trying to get MS. Instead it is what should be done.

Mow me with things like Scrougle and MS replaced YouTube as with their own i probably would not be so nice.

Look at Amazon will not allow Chromecast to be sold on their site. Personally i would have removed Amazon from their search engine but not Google.

Look at Uber. If i was Google i would use my power to destroy but not Google.

Feel how ever you want about Google but let's at least be fair.