2,318 karma · joined October 3, 2020
What the hell is that even supposed to mean?
Sorry but this piece read like total fluff to me, not a single compelling point – just pure fear mongering.
At this point we gotta be more wary of possibly mere attention seekers leaving those companies..
Do they not placate their new model.
Anyway to be clear its not meant that seriously, I'm neither currently on a hill nor ready to die.
> how would this alleged difference (most likely bs) actually show up in reality?
Furthermore: so they admit it's bs but still placate it like its the next biggest thing ever ... alright
All I'm saying is I refuse to buy into it anymore – yet many on here still do, including ... you?
Wdym Opus 5.5 scores 14.7% higher than GPT Astra for Terminal Bench 4.0?
How would this alleged difference (most likely bs) actually show up in reality?
GPT Astra was literally the best model in the world by a margin until 1 hour ago or so.
I mean, these people must be out of their minds thinking anyone truly wants this? ... No? Am I the only one who doesn't? Well then...
You have direct access to the development of "the most powerful technology ever" and your choice is ... to run?
Makes this whole stmt somewhat questionable imho. Does get one a ton of attention though I guess...
With the bicycle, some may prefer comfort, others speed, others offroad, etc., so it would not be obvious which one is "best".
I know this must somehow explain the giant numbers but I'm still not sure how precisely.
Counting in base 60 would make for much smaller numbers, no ?
For example, the number 16 in base 2 is 1111. but in base 10 it is 16. Ergo smaller base, larger number, and vice versa.
So did you mean to say they counted in units that are made of 1/600 of our solar years? I think that would make more sense, putting their reigns between 31-72 years of our counting.
at most, the result could be useful for fellow students
I have no doubt other cohorts would rate differently
it is known (on HN at least) e.g. that SWEs tend to prefer brevity, contrary to these students apparently
Instead of relying on the one-shot transcription, have the system double check key facts by asking the patient for confirmation:
"Can you confirm you've you taken psychoactive drugs before?" – "yes/no"
EtcPredictability is the inverse of information density.
Low information density enables high compression, and vice versa.
It's called entropy. This is basic information theory to be quite frank..
The author acting as if they discovered this independently had me feel the exact same way. Kinda irritating and almost ... disrespectful? Not sure of the right words to describe it tbh
At the risk of sounding like an LLM myself: this is exactly the key most seem to miss