jaywalk

The TSA's official policy is to accept IDs within a year of expiration: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/identification

Yeah, the scanners they use for age restriction are just standalone devices that show the age without the user having to figure it out themself.

AirMessage requires you to run a server on macOS, and Texts only supports iMessage on macOS. That's why Apple doesn't mind, because neither of those services is hacking iMessage itself.

It's really not. At all.

They've already come up with better, cheaper, more efficient methods. They don't need Sudafed anymore, so removing the stupid restriction won't affect meth production at all.

The reason they don't allow expired licenses for alcohol purchases is because an older, similar-looking person (sibling, etc.) could just give their expired license to someone who's underage.

Clouds at SFO???? Never!

With every other plane on visual, they can't just stick an ILS approach in there without messing everyone else up.

> your phrasing "Lufthasa is the one making this hard on everyone" just seems wrong, having more safety seems totally justified and reasonable here.

It's so "justified and reasonable" that nobody else does it. Maybe it's not quite so justified or as reasonable as you think.

They don't just leave cables hanging freely behind the walls.

Notifications aren't sent to IP addresses, so none of this matters.

The fact that it's still enabled by default on TVs being sold today is an unforgivable sin.

I guarantee you're not the only one. Do you think Spotify brought on someone like Rogan without considering protest cancellations?

Unless you are pretty high up at Spotify, you have literally no idea how much Joe Rogan has brought in for them. His podcast has been number one on the platform since it launched.

There really is no mechanical connection. And the Airbus A320 (first airliner with no mechanical backup) has been flying this way since 1988, so it's not anywhere near as dangerous as you think.

Yeah, I think that's all there is here.

Well yeah, of course. I'm talking about the most common scenario, where both parties are using Realtors (TM).

No, the seller pays the 6% commission to their agent and then their agent gives the buyer's agent half of it. That's how it works everywhere in the US.

What if the user "initiates the thread" by taking an explicit action on a website? The carrier has no way of knowing that, so what should they do? Just block everything? Not workable.

Yeah, I thought it was a Canadian thing as well. Coming from an area that was heavily populated by Indians, it was a relatively large part of the curriculum back in my younger days. And I never heard that term in relation to Native Americans.

A house is not a sovereign nation.

If I print that page, should I stay out of Maine unless/until this amendment passes?

Tabs.

I doubt it, at least initially. 911 calling is part of the licensing for cellular carriers, but Starlink isn't a cellular carrier. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out from a legal and regulatory point of view.

Where in the Declaration does it state that entering the US is an inalienable right? I'm confused.

This is exactly what China does today. How is it not in a country's best interest to deny a visa to aliens that hate the country?

> it is kind of violent and rape'y.

Comparing hearing an ad while you pump gas to rape is disgusting. Grow up.

At the bottom of the email, it said:

> Please note that this information is Okta confidential information and should not be shared outside of your organization.

Which is pretty hilarious, honestly.

It'll only apply to simple tax situations for this initial pilot launch.

> This[1] is the typical satellites thruster:

Define "typical" because it's not being used on any geostationary satellites.

> Power that up for 10 seconds on a satellite weighing 500 kg

500kg? Hilarious. These satellites are the size of a bus and their weights are measured in tons.