707 karma · joined October 23, 2012
There is little question that an author should easily be able to correct a factual inaccuracies in a Wikipedia article which is related to them or their work, however the rights of an author to suppress mentions of reviews of their work purely because they disagree with them, are a different matter entirely.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain#Anatole_Broyar...
You have, of course, the ability to appeal - basically saying "Samsung are full of shit, put my video back and tell them to sue me if they don't like it" and that's exactly what happened here.
Not so, of course - but unlike Xmodem and Ymodem which acknowledged every packet (and slowed things down), Zmodem would not constantly ack back to the host unless there was an error... So this triggered the modem's inactivity timeout, since despite the constant stream of data coming down from the remote system, there were no "keystrokes" or other packets travelling in the other direction. Hence, after X minutes... Line drop.
Easily sorted with a few AT commands, eventually. :)
Example: Take the PNG, convert it to another lossless format. Then convert that lossless format back to PNG.
Different file size, right? OK, the comment accounts for about 120 bytes.. but what about the rest? Why is it that much bigger?
"As I read, numbers I see. 'Twould be a great shame not to count this art among the great texts of our time" - count this art among the great texts... it's a one time pad, isn't it.
Er, it certainly would be a coincidence, since the EU investigation began some time before the Star Trek reboot was even conceived, and additionally since no such distribution deal between Paramount and Netflix exists, since Star Trek in its TV form is a CBS property.
Or there's always satellite...?
https://archive.org/details/usenet
Obviously the UTZOO collection is one of the more significant ones, but there are thousands of others too, including Giganews.
As the documentary points out, they just didn't think that anyone would be able to "aim and hit" the square they wanted - but they were mistaken, and paid for that complacency. They did not make the mistake a second time.
In other words, "we want to fix everything that is wrong with this success so that it makes more money."
This is why we can't have nice things.
"To get the thing you want, you have to say Yes. Will you say yes?" - How many people honestly choose the "no" option?
http://www.skymedia.co.uk/sky-adsmart/
It downloads demographically targeted ads to your set top box ahead of time, and on channels with the appropriate signalling, will automatically replace a live advert on the broadcast channel, with a targeted ad playing back from your set top box. The experience is pretty much seamless. Some of the case studies are really interesting.
If this is just counting the frequency of individual words, perhaps that's too simplistic an approach.
"NCC's work - which has been restricted to its labs..."
"Mr Davis said he had simulated his DAB-based attack only on equipment in his company's buildings..."
"But he added that he had previously compromised a real vehicle's automatic-braking system ... by modifying an infotainment system, and he believed this could be replicated via a DAB broadcast."
So basically this is one of those non-stories where a researcher looking for some press coverage broadcasts a custom radio station with a name like 'LOL I HAKD UR CAR', then shows it - in an office - to a zero-knowledge reporter who is immediately impressed as if it was a demonstration of anything at all. Whereas actually it's just some bloke in an office saying "well I'm sure this is possible, I've never done it, obviously."
I'm reminded of the words of Travis Goodspeed... Proof Of Concept or GTFO.
Some released software was dual-format as well - I particularly recall the Atari ST/Amiga version of Starglider. While the ST and Amiga boxes were both separately labelled, the actual disc inside was the same, and worked on either machine.