19 karma · joined February 5, 2015
What do you think a developer using Javascript should use/know right now?
What were your thoughts on the broader points of the post?
On the flip side, case may be they genuinely can't afford to pay as much - but potential applicants may be swayed if they trust in them, and choose to forgo a higher salary or accept other compensation methods or benefits.
But what you've said here would be appropriate when it comes to the best in their fields. And not just with salary (other compensation, care packages, etc). But would 'competitive' be less appropriate than something like 'negotiatiable?'
Instead of salary range, what would interest you? (firm, tech stack, vision?)
How might companies tackle the issues some have listed here of displaying salaries, while not deterring people (assuming they're being fair, not exploitative).
Now, having an ex-POTUS reading their is one helluva bragging right for him!
Human nature would suggest as much (we'd certainly hope for reciprocations of actions that demonstrate trust in the everyday at least). But as others have mentioned - there are drawbacks to being transparent, even with the potential benefits from the created virtuous circle.
Each side of the bands/'competitive' debate has +/-s for sure. By 'bid to play' do you mean a 'race to the bottom' sort of thing re: salary/compensation?
Any other words/phrases you've seen in your job travels/perusings haha (for better or worse)?
I could certainly agree with that. It doesn't confine a company to a certain $x, but isn't as opaque as the bog standard 'competitive.'
What was your experience with the former white panther like?
Transparency (not just on salary, but role/skill expectations too) would appear to build trust. What can firms that can't offer as much do, do you think?
Why do you think companies might not show salaries?
Any ideas as to why salaries might be left as something broad like 'competitive'?