1,347 karma · joined February 16, 2015
The inflation and preemptive price increases are really making things unaffordable.
I think this is just the Covid era price increases and its aftermath. And we haven’t seen the second wave that’s going to come from the recent oil shocks.
I presume the insurance providers thought they would be the only ones using the AI tools to auto-process (find creative ways to reject) insurance claims.
Even just the fact that people might learn about their rights, or find better ways to express their issues with correct wording would yield higher approvals, which would mean lesser profit margins for providers. And of course they will lobby for additional government subsidies.
Even in fresh sessions with minimal context like a file with a couple hundreds of lines of code, it would frequently ignore clear instructions, avoid work, and even sometimes “think” things like “looking for ways to code without approval”.
The model is just tuned for long running and doesn’t like to work with a human in the loop, or work back and forth.
And strangely, expressing frustration multiple times in a row would reliably trigger a feedback popup as well.
Edit: Spelling. “right” to “sick”.
Will Europe accept being a manufacturer only? Or will they finally pick up with a late comer advantage? We need to wait and see.
The Uber case is extremely sad, people lost their lives and nothing brings them back, regardless of which justice system we use.
Make it a public record with other bindings like one ruling applies to all customers etc. then at least it’s a system with transparency.
It’s one thing to say the legal system is expensive and slow, let’s resolve our issues by a third party, and another thing to where there’s no further action you can take and the arbitration authority is being paid by the company.
Its simply becoming a parallel legal system for a different class.
Companies are not doing this for faster problem resolution, they’re doing this to shield themselves from the consequences of their own actions.
The weather information can easily be transmitted every minute and it can be nicely visualized in the cockpit instead of being crammed into cryptic abbreviations and ancient codes.
Similarly, we are aware of the precise aircraft location and it's intended course, I'm talking about commercial airlines here, so we already know where they're going and what the approach path will be etc.
I find it hard to accept that we're collecting terabytes of telemetry from engines and all the other equipment on the aircraft, but we expect to communicate the weather and traffic information in verbal ways.
There are so many good ways we can solve the underlying requirements, but I think it's all stuck on the cost of implementation and who's going to be making money from it.
Weather data can be published every minute and shown live as a full map over the screen, not as random abbreviations of wind and cloud coverage.
And we already know where each aircraft is, and where they took off, and where they're headed. So practically speaking the radio talk can be limited to only the important communication and emergencies, while increasing the situational awareness by at least ten fold.
One can easily imagine a system that broadcasts the weather and clearance, and even aircraft location data close to real-time, and provide great situational awareness to everyone involved.
I don't think it's acceptable to put tens of thousands of people within a crowded airspace and not do everything in our power to keep things organized and secure.
You want to get your approach clearance or weather report? Just call up the ATC on busy line with bunch of people talking fast and over each other.
It’s simply exhausting.
There’s so much interference that the package dropout rate is around 40% at 2.4GHz usually.