739 karma · joined February 20, 2007
reach me at jedavis83@gmail.com
For me, this means my Javascript looks more like Python -- it can be a little weird, but switching between the frontend and the backend is easier that way.
I'd also recommend using objects as namespaces if you're not dealing with prototypical objects. It makes grepping easier - you can search for 'Graphs.init' instead of 'init' in this example:
var Graphs = {
state_variable: null, // store global state somehow
init: function() {
// Some initialization code
},
refresh: function(img_element, url) {
// some code to refresh the src url
}
};In my experience, hackers have always been the quiet type. Now some loud ones have changed what it means to be a hacker through popularity.
Having worked as an electrical engineer creating hardware, this seems strange. Obviously the computer designer had to create an API of some sort, even if they did it in transistors. Computers aren't given to us from above -- there are people creating them too.
If the idea grows big, it's fun to look at where it was when I started. If it fizzles, well at least you have something for the memories...
Some impressions from the demo:
Resolutions appear to be backwards to what I'm used to seeing -- I'm used to 'width by height.'
Demo page says I've received 0 visits. Maybe make the demo page some live data for vistrac or something -- that reads strangely.
Oops, can't click around more right now... looks like your site went down.
(shameless plug, I run http://sitecanary.com/ -- check it out :)
How much would taxes have to rise? 0.0001%? Or is there some room for negotiations? What if the US raised taxes more on companies that offshored jobs?
This seems like basic politicing at its best. Big companies are going to start playing taxes chicken with big government. By making blanket, vague statements like these, they hope to shape the conversation amongst politicians. There's a real conflict of interest when these guys start telling the government what's good for business.
That said, how much of our idea of valuations come from web apps? I was thinking about the number $215M and realized the only reason that it seems small is because Facebook is valued at $6B, or YouTube was bought for $1.6B. Outside of software, I can't think of companies that are really valued at these amounts, unless they make power plants or airplanes or some other giant necessity.
Is this how much companies are actually worth and we're all just in such a ridiculous bubble that we can't see it, or did these guys get desperate and cash out?
For instance, once you know how databases work, an ORM won't save you that much time -- it'll just shield from the internals, which are what I find interesting.
Given their recent media attention and emphasis on new users, I will be surprised to see a business model any more innovative than advertising. However, I really hope to be surprised!
I consider the music, movie and now literature based problem to be basically the same issue regarding digital distribution. Any problem that was present with music will be a problem with the others. I wouldn't be surprised to see iTunes selling books in the future.
If Scribd can provide some pressure to make content less expensive or give people more options, I think that's as good as Amazon's mp3 store was towards making iTunes DRM free.
iTunes has managed to sell an incredible amount of content, even though it doesn't make much sense to me or you. I think in the past I've overestimated what an individual will pay for the ability to Buy This Copyrighted Content. I guess time will tell if this model can apply to text-based content.
Our latest site, http://sitecanary.com/ has the UI completely written in webpy.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=meaning+of+life
I guess they knew their audience enough to answer the obvious questions.
If Microsoft gets its act together and makes a browser that people don't mind using (and I believe IE8 is significant progress), I could see that level off around the 50% mark.
Similarly, if Webkit or FF makes some tremendous progress or has some killer feature, I could see IE's share drop very abruptly. So far however, the competition has mostly gone for feature parity.
One of the things that bugs me about the IE6 browser wars is that the majority of outspoken people think supporting standards would help. In nearly all fields (with healthy competition) supporting standards is something you need to do before anyone will adopt your product, and then you get to worry about new features.
I think this mindset of standards compliance has caused FF and Webkit to not push more interesting ideas. Want to support a video tag? Do it. Just make sure you follow the HTML 5 spec first. That's where real innovation comes from -- for instance, the creation of AJAX wasn't a standard, but Microsoft adopted it, and the other browsers thought it was a good idea.
Google made sense as king of the hill, since it solved a relatively hard problem incredibly well. Then came Facebook, which solved a fairly easy problem, but scaled really well. Now Twitter has come along and solved a relatively simple problem, and they probably have the scaling issue figured out finally. Maybe I've just become jaded, but I thought we expected more from the next big thing both in terms of execution and difficulty.
I suspect that a fairly common use for commercial users would be medical imaging storage -- huge amounts of data, but rarely accessed. A few other pluses for medical applications: hospitals care about volumetric density so that they don't have to store giant piles of USB keys; they don't want to have to maintain electronics on a per-disc basis so harddrives aren't the best solution.
Just a thought, but GE usually markets towards industries with technological applications rather than computer technologies themselves.
Good idea with DomainKeys -- gmail seems to be alright with a reverse DNS lookup resolving to our domain.
Cheers!
Cheers!
Cheers!