Twitter to Launch Business Tools by Year-End
wired.com
wired.com
Perhaps we simply have ideological differences, but I can't help but think they just really don't see the importance of moving quickly on this.
Here's the lesson: if you own the platform, and the platform's growing, grow the platform as big as you can because you can always add tools for monetization later. When you add tools, they become the default. (example: Facebook Photos.)
The mindset is totally different when you're growing a VC-backed company. The rational thing to do when you have capital to spare is to go for growth - it's just not the same as bootstrapping with a back pocket full of cash. You run the business differently.
Plus, the minute you start making money, the metrics totally change. What's the metric Twitter investors use right now? Tweet views[1].
The only example I can think of that failed was eBay's BillPay and it turns out that PayPal was a platform with its own viral nature, not a mere feature (oh, and they burned $180 million before they hit breakeven[2]).
[1]http://www.businessinsider.com/what-twitter-really-wants-fro... [2] http://www.pehub.com/40062/peter-thiel-on-valleywag-its-the-...
In addition, there are many cases of the "grow the platform" idea failing: Myspace and Youtube are damn good ones. Yes, they both have lots and lots of users, but where are they in terms of profit? Last I heard, they're both operating at a significant loss, although I haven't seen numbers for Myspace in a while.
But then what differentiates them?
>It will be “simple stuff” such as lightweight analytics
okay...so technology as the driver has just walked out the door.
It seems like their sales pitch towards businesses will be based on the size of their user base. Which if thats the case won't they inevitably lose to Facebook? Facebook has a user base several times larger and as we've all seen Facebook is ready, willing, and happy to copy whatever works from whomever.
Look at the prices Get Satisfaction charges: http://getsatisfaction.com/pricing
Think of the number of companies on Twitter.
I don't see a reason why they wouldnt pay $100/month to be able to engage with more users/ engage with users more easily.
Given their recent media attention and emphasis on new users, I will be surprised to see a business model any more innovative than advertising. However, I really hope to be surprised!
I hope they figure it out though, they'd be a great case study on a question we'd all like answered.