815 karma · joined September 17, 2007
I've been looking at this for a few hours, and I am floored.
Am I missing something in existing IDE's?
I think every other non-optical port on your computer is just as susceptible to electrical attack. The only real difference is that USB provides its own power.
This is a human delivery mechanism for a physical attack. You could make a DVI cable that was covertly a water hose, but that's not a DVI problem.
I see it blue-black, inverted it looks like blue lace with dark fabric. If I saw this first I would think that the original lace would look yellow and the fabric light.
Suppose that I write the software to implement this CA, but not display it, just jostle the memory locations. That is still art.
Suppose the rules are such that it is clear that all the on cells will be turned off, with some perhaps complex interactions in between. Then you don't need to run the code to see the art, just read the source.
I think any implementation of Towers of Hanoi is art.
The paints 'civilized law' as authoritarian, vengance based, and using primitive means to try to alter behavior.
With knowledge of the algorithm, you can do a lot more.
This argument applies to people too and we have ways to deal with it other than people being owned.
This is becoming a freemium product.
You might think it's bad to take advantage of that, but refraining from doing so doesn't likely yield a fair product quality ranking, just some different unfair rating.
Our fitness function is broken.
>©COPYRIGHT CERN 2007 for the content of CERN Courier and images and logos identifying CERN.
>©COPYRIGHT IOP 2007 for the design, format and typography of the CERN Courier Web Pages, ...
The author appears to be an astrophysicist, and you may know CERN from such products as the Large Hadron Collider and the World Wide Web.
So what happens to the mosquitoes when the fish population drops?
"An attack on a software flaw that occurs before the software's developers have had time to develop a patch for the flaw is often known as a zero-day exploit."
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/zero-day-exploit-definition,news...
You could have a whole set of sessions with children exploring different arrangements of coins and noting that no matter how many you add within the hull, you don't get any 'more coin' (altering the plurality may help adults understand this problem.) If you have some button[s] and much more coin[s], can you add just one coin so that you have more coin than button? How far away do you need to add it?
College : Proper MOOC : Closed MOOC ::
Newspaper : Online Media : PaywallsA) Our capabilities are being restricted by the circumstances we find ourselves in. A dog happens to be in a cage built hundreds of years ago. There must be some words to describe this situation, I think inhumane applies.
B) Now we can start opening the cage.
Edit: our natural environment is inhumane and awful. Your commentary seems to heavily favor the status quo in a way I can't relate to.
The additional inhumanity of media is from 2 things: the fact that information processing has been mostly limited, and that information processing has become really important lately, so a lot of people are spending a lot of their time in that limited environment.
Changing the analogy to a fish in a tank suggests an assertion that these other intellectual modes are not important for human experience and wouldn't make communication more effective and efficient.
To tweak the analogy further: Otters are very good at swimming, but their habitats should include land.
North Korea routinely provides much better reasons to intervene.
The AI would have to evaluate the goal by some standard, so 'maximize paperclips' is a proxy for whatever goals get a high evaluation from the standard. Getting the standard right presents essentially the same problem as setting the goal.
Putting in 'a need to be intellectually satisfied by the complexity of your end product' is complicated and still wouldn't save humanity.
Who decides what jobs are available? Who decide who gets which jobs?
By giving a job instead of money, you are using up a significant chunk of the labor pool. You need an additional chunk to figure out how to allocate it, and are then relying on them to allocate it well. To build something, you are also paying for and using up capital.
By giving money, people are free to use their time in whatever way is most valuable to them, only using up the resources they need to live, and those resources get allocated by market forces.
At a lower level, this is strengthening a proprietary platform, and might lower adoption of FOSS platforms.
At a higher level, co-opting an open source technology to deliver closed source software may indicate a strategic flaw in our approach to FOSS. On Microsoft's part this is clearly a continuation of 'embrace and extend'.
They'll use docker to provide the functionality and build hype until they can build their own version into the OS by default. Docker on Windows becomes obsolete, and everyone runs apps on Azure.
Since law enforcement typically wants convictions, it could be a selling point to prompt for uninstall when a warrant expires.
Do you think you are free to do that?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sqdr/hexo-your-autonomo...