Code Keyboards
codekeyboards.com
codekeyboards.com
http://www.wasdkeyboards.com/index.php/products/mechanical-k...
Also, there are some weird keys out of reach from the home row you may need every now and then - the fn keys on a Mac being a good example. Turning volume up/down in very low lighting is a pain if you can't see the keys.
That said, I found the blue LEDs of the Macbook keyboard backlight to be too bright when used in combination with flux on lowest screen brightness, so I wrote a small command line app to reduce it below the minimum normally permitted by the function keys: https://github.com/drhaynes/brightness.c
On the CODE keyboard your VolUp/VolDown is PgUp/PgDn, combined with the Fn key.
Because I'm a touch typist I keep my back-lights toggled off.
What I really like about it, which for some reason is relatively rare in mechanical keyboards, is the built-in USB hub. Nice for a mouse or headset dongle, especially on a port-starved machine like a Surface Pro.
When I bought my laptop, backlit keyboards weren't standard. Now they are and I'm looking forward to getting a new one.
Until someone does do that, I'm going to stick with a Lenovo USB keyboard. But when they do, I'll be the first to buy, especially if it has n-key-rollover for plover stenography.
This one has ended but they said they're going to relaunch it https://www.massdrop.com/buy/tex-yoda?mode=guest_open
Web marketers take note. If you redirect from a product page to a landing page, you are making it harder for people to give you money and harder for people to spread the word about your products.
The backlighting on it is also perfect.
I don't DVORAK, but the included keypuller makes it simple to swap keys around if you are so inclined.
Buy one.
You know what would be nice? If the keyboard had enough intelligence to read the keycaps and modify which codes it sent based on which keycaps are attached to which switches.
OS key remapping tends to vary from 'xmodmap' to 'worse than xmodmap', in my experience. It would be nice if the stupidly obvious thing worked for once.
If they put the resistors in the keycaps and managed to get stable contacts to the switches below working, one might be able to get a feature like that in hardware.
But allowing to reprogram the keys in the keyboard controller probably is easier. Longer initial setup time, but how often do people change their keyboard layouts?!
Interesting to imagine most keyboards are that primitive.
It's also interesting to see gamers continuing to push technology forwards.
> But allowing to reprogram the keys in the keyboard controller probably is easier. Longer initial setup time, but how often do people change their keyboard layouts?!
It's worth it if the setup is obnoxious enough, and, well, this is something which should be possible, and it's annoying that it hasn't been done yet.
A very naïve person would expect that changing where the keycaps are would change which switch corresponds to which keycode. Only they'd think of it more like "Hey, the key I want to press is over there, but if I swap things around a bit, I can put it in this more convenient location over here." This isn't stupidity, it's merely expecting the world to be more obvious in its workings than it actually is.
Obviousness is a good UI heuristic. It isn't everything, and it can lead you down some dumb blind alleys, but in this case I can't think of any non-technical reason it shouldn't be made to work.
I don't agree with this. Nobody would expect that rearranging the buttons on their car dashboard would change the original functionality. Same for buttons in a lift, coffee machine, anything you care to name. People are very familiar with the idea that the switch is just a sticker on an underlying mechanism. They don't think the letters inscribed on the plastic magically embody some functionality. So I think your whole premise is wrong.
Unfortunately you cannot swap the keys that sit in different rows. You couldn't swap a "Q" and an "A" for example - they have different profiles. See here for more information (picture on the right if you just want a quick visual):
This is the keyboard Jeff Atwood was talking about I think: http://blog.codinghorror.com/the-code-keyboard/
My observations: The keyboard itself is heavy and feels nice. I love the lack of obnoxious branding. The backlight is actually pretty useful and has a few settings for brightness. I primarily use this one at home, but I've considered getting another one for the office. Would recommended.
I need to get my hands on one of these mechanical keyboards just to see what I'm missing I guess.
I was able to get my hands on one, and it felt perfect... tenless, nkey rollover, topre, cherry mx keycaps, removable cable and built like a truck (thing is like 2 pounds).
Just realized I didn't mention the actual keyboard, too much inside baseball on this thread I guess -- you knew what I was talking about at least, the Novatouch TKL: http://gaming.coolermaster.com/en/products/keyboards/novatou...
It is interesting that in the time since I purchased it, they toned down the gaming aspect in the marketing.
Some people may think the greens are too heavy, but I love the weight behind the keys.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2109730/wasd-keyboards-wasd-v...
I personally just want a minimalist TKL without a ridiculous key font, which doesn't seem to be too common. The 4C Das Keyboards seem nice but apparently they aren't Cherry keys, so based on what I've heard, I'm wary.
Both are Das Keyboards, and I absolutely love them. Beware, once you upgrade to a mechanical keyboard, you'll never be able to go back!
I've since bought two Realforce 87U keyboards (with all 45g switches [1]). Topre switches don't seem to require nearly as much force or travel distance as the Cherry MX switches offered on the CODE keyboard, but still feel crisp.
The backlighting and key layout (normal-sized super key, media key location, etc.) on the CODE keyboard are pretty hard to beat, though.
[1] https://elitekeyboards.com/products.php?sub=topre_keyboards,...
I really wish Apple made a backlit black-key keyboard, basically the 2011 MBP (newer rMBPs and all the airs have shorter travel) but external. I have the Apple desktop keyboards and the keys on them feel too thin / hollow / cheap and aren't backlit. The travel also feels different than MacBooks in that it feels less solid, as if the caps wiggle around more or something. Super nit-picky but that's what I like!
[1] http://www.typematrix.com/2030/features.php [2] http://www.kaufmann.no/roland/dvorak/
At home, I use a Das Keyboard with Cherry MX Brown switches, because they're more responsive for gaming and the Das Keyboard has dedicated media buttons and volume wheel.
Before that, I had an Aivia with Cherry MX Brown switches, which had a lot of the advantages of the Das Keyboard but had a very annoying light in the corner (although it might be possible with some hackery to turn it into a useful status light, as it changes color). It did have USB and audio passthrough though, which the Code and Das Keyboard do not have.
As I'm not looking for a new keyboard I was just hoping for some innovation in keyboard layouts. The thing has the same damn keys like every keyboard out there. How about something that actually makes coding more efficient. Maybe an extra row of keys below F1-F12, for language-specific keywords or code snippets.
Programming requires me to deal with abstract and unintuitive concepts all the time ... which are then broken down from programming constructs, to words, all the way to the individual letters which I have to type in one by one.
But maybe keyboard design has already reached perfection and all that remains is choosing green or brown Cherry keys.
I've been waiting for such a keyboard for 15 years.
http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/en-us/p/sculpt-ergonomic-d...
https://www.trulyergonomic.com/store/index.php (mech switches too)
I really don't like any Cherry switches. They are for point of sale terminals.
I'm saving up for a Realforce (Topre keys). My little Happy Hacking Lite has excellent (non-Topre) keys, though I don't know what's under the key caps. Some sort of high quality membrane technology.
At home I have a DAS MX brown, but at work I'm using a <10$ IBM 7953 rubber dome one and it beats the MX's (for me) for progging by a mile.
I've been using my HP c3753a for 18 years now (same layout as these, great feel and sound (similar to IBM M)). If it ever dies, I'll just use the backup I grabbed 10 years ago.
It's kind of like buying new antique furniture. I'm sure the keyboard is solid and will last, but I've got the original...
I use a Kinesis Advantage so I haven't gotten around to buying one for myself, but I want it every time I do something with it.
They're also working on a new ten-keyless model that should be out "soon"...
I took out the o-rings because they made it too gummy. It was very stiff for a bit when I did that, but I got used to it and now I can play games of CS:GO and code on it just fine.
I recommend it, it's simple, small and feels solid.
sad
Wondering how the MX Clears compare to MX Blue; I'm currently using a Ducky Shine 3 with MX Blue, I attempted to put on some o-rings to quiet the clicks, but lost a lot of tactile feedback which annoyed me.
I personally have the code TKL and like it quite a bit with the thicker O-rings (reduces travel and noise), but I'd really like something like a higher-quality laptop-travel scissor switch which actuates a mechanical key switch.
That aside, the low-travel feel is fantastic and it's worth the trade-off.
I happen to own two keyboards: a mechanical one similar to this, and the Apple keyboard. I think the Apple keyboard is great, but finally it's a very basic laptop-style chiclet keyboard with nothing remarkable about it other than good aesthetics and compatibility with OS X. I won't bore you with the details of why people are willing to pay $100-$200 for a keyboard like this, but just know that there are good reasons.
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ergodox-ez-an-incredible-...
Copy editors: you mean "Sound damping".
> 1. a decrease in the amplitude of an oscillation as a result of energy being drained from the system to overcome frictional or other resistive forces.
vs
> dampen, v
> 2. make less strong or intense.
I'm pretty sure they meant what they said.
So you're correct -- I remember reading articles about suspension (ie: bicycle shocks) where they talked about the damping adjustments, and went through pains to differentiate between "damping" (ie: damping the rebound effect of the suspension spring) versus "dampening" (to make something damp (ie: wet))... but I guess "dampening" works all ways... I thought it was an annoying common-ish mistake, and here I am in error...
Edit: more etymology -- http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/67497/is-it-dampi...