Lest one person out of a thousand that read this actually try the things mentioned in the article, I'd like to point out that the topics in the article such as summoning demons and dabbling in magic is ultimately not desirable.
467 karma · joined April 26, 2014
Lest one person out of a thousand that read this actually try the things mentioned in the article, I'd like to point out that the topics in the article such as summoning demons and dabbling in magic is ultimately not desirable.
yes but this accurate in describing what the last couple women I was with were like. they were both women who approached me first, whatever that might tell you.
But removing the path would be a burden to those discovering how the web really works.
>I’ve been living in Taiwan for 3+ years, and am baffled that I never pay attention to semiconductors.
I can't imagine how baffled he's going to be when he discovers Taiwan considers itself part of China.
I find this very surprising, especially considering this should vary by state (although I know this might be the kind of thing the Commerce Clause could get up into).
I can't find any information that there's a cap on wheat production in the US. Got a source?
If you intend to sell it, well the differences of economy of scale of a small farm versus a large farm and the resulting cost difference alone should have been obvious. You wouldn't have been competing well in that market either, right?
Is this the new normal?
That's exactly what scientists often do when they reproduce experiments.
"Science denial", as it comes across in this headline to the common person, conveys an appeal to authority that scientific results are not to be questioned. This inversion of the scientific method is used to give consensus to scientific results that support the status quo.
In reality, questioning scientific results has always been a necessary part of the scientific method.
Archive.is a free service and goes offline frequently so I'm inclined to believe he's really trying to triage the problem queue, unless I'm missing something.
What's been up with Venus? It's been really bright for weeks if not months now.
They also have unclear "hate speech" guidelines where they will remove videos and ban channels without specifying why.
The point is, this behavior is consistent with YouTube.
>Still, it’s peculiar timing for Patreon, given the company touted an increase in new memberships during the first three weeks of March.
Peculiar indeed. So what is a factor not yet mentioned?
69 days ago, I was net downvoted after pointing out specifically what trouble was coming for Patreon.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22316071
>>I wonder if consumers could use forced arbitration in the same way.
>They can. Patreon is about to be hit really hard for playing thought policeman.
Now we are here.
It is more accurate to say due to the shutdown.
Goodbye civilization? Most people can't read? It's done?
No my friend, isolation seems to be getting to your head. "When I look out the window, only 10-15% are wearing masks". That's far more than many other places.
My reply is, "Because I can do math."
Was surprised to find the article wasn't about that.
I counter your ad hominem with a substantive appeal to authority and evidence to the contrary: the author is not only a lawyer, but the one who broke open the Epstein case (pedophilia accusation conspiracy theory that stood up to scrutiny) with a Florida filing alongside the Miami Herald.