Scientists find life in dead brain cells
forgetoday.com
forgetoday.com
I should reiterate: this is archive.is' doing this, not Cloudflare.
EDIT: Some more details, including quotes from Cloudflare's CEO from another internet citizen: https://jarv.is/notes/cloudflare-dns-archive-is-blocked/
EDIT2: I should mention that I still use 1.1.1.1, and I agree with their stance on this. :)
Archive.is a free service and goes offline frequently so I'm inclined to believe he's really trying to triage the problem queue, unless I'm missing something.
It reminds me of a scene in the TV series "Fringe" where they wheel a body into the evil corporation "Massive Dynamics" high-tech lab, where the CEO orders that he be interrogated since he's only been dead for five hours.
The claim that this was true was rejected years ago, but thinking about it is scary.
I loved that show.
What you're describing is physically impossible and has in fact never been observed by science. Electrical activity implies chemical activity and an active metabolism. Dead brain cells lose their electrical potential, eventually the cell walls break down and spill their dead biochemical machinery, effectively liquefying the organ. Our cemeteries are not full of intact, electrically active brains somehow.
When a neuron is deprived of oxygen, it shuts down. Some intracellular processes run until their educts are exhausted, and then come to a stop. When an anoxic brain cell is then re-supplied with oxygen after this shut down has progressed too far, the sudden resumation of processes means that these previously accumulated cytotoxic reaction products are now suddenly disrupting normal biochemical processes - this disruption leads to the death of the cell after it has been re-supplied. We call this category of damage reperfusion injuries.
Reperfusion damage is perverse in the sense that, while the neuron was damaged during anoxia, its actual death only plays out once its chemical programs start running again. But in a way this is also promising, since in the future we should be able to prevent this kind of cell death, effectively prolonging the time a patient can survive anoxia without brain damage. There are drugs that we give stroke patients today with this mechanism in mind, but so far the results have been mixed.
> stroke or in coma and have large areas of the brain with dead cells
In a live body, dead brain cells quickly break down and are resorbed. There is nothing left to fix there. The correct time to take action is while cells are still intact, in the delicate stage before and shortly after oxygen supply is restored.
The idea of infants being raised to adulthood by machinery in unknown conditions to start a new civilization seems more like branching into a different species when you really think it through. I have greatly enjoyed this story line in fiction, but I honestly don't see it as remotely realistic for many, many decades if not centuries. Unless we stumble across the Singularity or something, haha.
We are quite a ways from fully understanding even a single neuron.
I have trouble interpreting discoveries like these because my understanding of (neuro)biology is limited. For example, this:
> At the cellular level, these brains are very close to being alive, but if we consider the life of the brain as the expression of the functionality of the brain, then they’re very far from being alive.
I understand this is basically saying, "Just because the cells are working doesn't mean the brain is." But then my question is, what's the gap? I know the brain is complex at all, but it's always been a little strange to me that we aren't better at bringing back the dead. Do we know what it theoretically takes to "start" a brain?
Just saying...
[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/03/24/820601571/all-of-this-panic-c...
The 1% number if support by a pretty wide variety of sources and studies that have all been relatively consistent in the 1%-0.1% order of magnitude - more recently they seem to have been converging on the 0.5% to 0.25% range (though I haven't been thorough enough in reading the literature to want to state that range confidently).
A relatively recent and good example of such a study would be this one [1] from Germany. They sampled 600 people relatively randomly from the population, tested them all, and looked at the outcomes.
[1] https://www.land.nrw/sites/default/files/asset/document/zwis...
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200506.15905...
Not to mention which, some estimates of asymptomatic case rate go up to 50% (others substantially less so, it probably depends both on age range and what you define as asymptomatic)
By the way, direct link to the study is https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2020....
Or at least they would like to if they weren't trees and weren't dead.