Is this a typo, or are they really selling this few cars? Must be the SF bay area bubble, I see a Model S all the time!
206 karma · joined January 15, 2011
Is this a typo, or are they really selling this few cars? Must be the SF bay area bubble, I see a Model S all the time!
It's like the author knew it was a bad idea too (he put noexcept(false) on the destructor; without which in C++11 the program terminates immediately when an exception is thrown from destructor).
If there's some way to avoid terminating when there's a double exception in the destructor, that would be good to hear!
One simple way I can think of is to reuse the same variable instead.
ThrowOnError throw_on_error;
std::cout << libfoo_create_widgets(1, &c1, throw_on_error) << libfoo_create_widgets(2, &c2, throw_on_error);In particular, the fact that it's using inline asm directly (for cpuid, ud2, some others). Maybe with 'as' but that's not exactly pure bash (and I suspect not embedding it in C would need a non-trivial main function anyway).
Reading an arbitrary memory address (for the cpuid scans) might be a bit tricky too, though it could be doable with /proc/$PID/mem.
There's very little context on what the bug is and how to reproduce it besides some vague references to PressureNET (which means very little to someone who hasn't used that before).
It's not exactly an apple-to-oranges comparison. Like I just got 100+ wpm in Ruby but what's the point of feeling good about that when it's just typing out a list of symbols over and over again?
(but different games. if I want to play TF2 and the family member wants to play Dragon Age, I don't see why that shouldn't be possible!)
Heck, you can already play single/multi player games simultaneously just by sharing passwords and using offline mode. Color me unexcited.
Here's even a quick config file change you can make so that your Steam always starts in offline mode and doesn't force-logout the other person already logged in. http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25474... (tried this with my dad and it works great as long as he doesn't need to patch).
But why recommend changing operator new/delete by using a macro instead of privately inheriting a class that does that?
Chapul (Chaco Bar) ingredients:
* Dates
* Peanuts
* Toasted Oats
* Chocolate Chips
* Walnuts
* Agave Nectar
* Cricket Flour
* Gryllus
* Flax Seed Meal
* Salt
Exo (Cacao Nut) ingredients: * Raw Almonds
* Dates
* Coconut
* Honey
* Cricket Flour
* Raw Cacao Nibs
* Raw Cacao Powder
* Vanilla Extract
* Sea SaltWhat is the market for desktop CPUs where the desktop buyers don't also have dedicated video cards which can do a almost a magnitude better job than the APU?
Apparently the security hole was that you just needed to provide the email and birthdate to the tech support, then they'd go ahead and reset your info.
At least there's no way to transfer the goods onto another account like there is on Steam (yet).
The worst part about all this is when you ask the tech support how your password got reset, they always say it's your fault (you got a virus, keylogger, etc) and never that it's theirs (social engineering, database lost, etc). Guess you gotta keep face.
For example..
Positives:
* Person is a go getter, gets things done, doesn't get blocked
* Person is meticulous, pays careful attention to detail
* Person is a good communicator, articulating explanations eloquently
Negatives: * Person stumbles around an incorrect solution until hints are given
* Person jumps to conclusion without considering the bigger picture (or the edge cases)
* Person doesn't seem to get it, or at least can't explain himself/herself well
---------And this can then be inferred from the technical "coding" question, or in more traditional companies they will ask direct questions (usually known as "behavioral" questions) that focus on just those personality traits.
To give a particular example, at Amazon the "culture fit" of a candidate is how well they adhere to the company's leadership principles:
Maybe the javascript garbage collection?
The question is, how will they balance a hardcore gaming community which hates paying to get better (stats-wise) items vs monetizing F2P? Will they charge only for cosmetic items, or will they drive away their core Dota fanbase?
Even if it's not true, shouldn't Google pushing for the GPU drivers to be fixed? This is a pretty obvious huge flaw [that has been pretty much solved on Desktop].
Hopefully they're at least using some kind of compiler analysis to only use the same lock across transactions if it's touching the same memory addresses (pessimistically of course)?
It doesn't block the UI and yet it still gives the user an indication when the actions are in progress/completed.
Of course, it's entirely too sensible to have actually happened. Instead the IE team went off and wrote their own JIT for IE7/8/whatever and are still playing catch up to Chrome.
At this time about 2 years ago they did have JS running on CLR and it was 2x faster than any browser out there.