I don't necessarily agree with it, but that's the common refrain yes.
262 karma · joined October 19, 2016
I don't necessarily agree with it, but that's the common refrain yes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/05/13/elon-m...
There's a long history of this happening in the USA if you're interested: https://www.amazon.com/High-Cost-Good-Intentions-Entitlement...
I don't have any data, but I imagine that explains the similar serious accident rate.
Lone Starr : Listen! We're not just doing this for money!
Barf : [Barf looks at him, raises his ears]
Lone Starr : We're doing it for a SHIT LOAD of money!
I had assumed that as well. No reason things will look better by then, and the preventative measures taken in that time probably won't sufficient enough to otherwise resume normal life either.
Also, the cynic in me says that the government class wants to get people used to the idea of a shelter in place piecemeal, because it might not go over as well if they said 1 month straight out of the gate.
When the hospital decides after the fact to bill you thousands of dollars you won't have much of a recourse besides telling your family members to ignore the calls from aggressive medical collection agencies at 3am.
"...very low-birth-weight infants who are at high risk of dying within the first day tend to be counted as live births. In countries where the health care system does not place the same emphasis on neonatal intensive care, the outcomes of such pregnancies are not likely to be recorded as live births. Hence, it appears that the more resources a country's health care system places on saving high-risk newborns, the more likely its registration will report a higher IMR" [0]
Hope you're right about the CA housing market coming down, but I think more likely is just that Gavin Newsom and ilk get booted out for their failures to reign in PG&E and housing prices aren't particularly effected one way or the other.
Wildfires are generally not in the densely populated areas, so I don't think they'll move the needle much.
I've also seen GANDALF (google amazon netflix dropbox amazon linkedin facebook), but dropbox probably doesn't belong in that list. There's plenty of backronyms, but one ends up just hitting critical mass.
I know somehow who got fired from Google for taking a half gallon on milk home, because it was late and he didn't feel like swinging by the grocery store.
My biggest issue with a wealth tax on the super-wealthy is that it would quickly morph into a wealth tax on everyone above lower-middle class.
Old article but the numbers have scaled proportionately...
"If the IRS grabbed 100 percent of income over $1 million, the take would be just $616 billion. That’s only a third of this year’s deficit. Our national debt would continue to explode." [0]
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/danbigman/2012/04/03/john-stoss...
Couldn't believe it, so I looked it up https://www.ft.com/content/74573de6-0a15-11ea-bb52-34c8d9dc6...
that is bizarre
In addition to the soft tax of excessive inflation mentioned by the other poster, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have proposed wealth taxes.
https://www.businessinsider.com/wealth-tax-definition-explai...
You can agree with that or not morally, but it is by definition a tax on already legal (and taxed during income) money.
So fundamentally it's a parsing exploit on untrusted user input. They should have been able to simplify and test this mechanism extensively enough to not have this type of vulnerability, because it doesn't sound like researchers even had to go to the level of the timing attacks that came up recently in a related area [0] [1].
[0] http://tpm.fail/ [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21520074
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-does-judgment-p...
[0] https://pagetwo.completecolorado.com/2017/12/15/colorado-has...
I don't have hard statistics and won't try to look them up.
I'm not sure if this is referencing the current predicament in California (which Gavin Newsom is attempting to blame on climate change [0]), but if so the reality is closer to...
-failure to carry out proper controlled burns [1]
-corrupt California legislature being heavily backed by PG&E lobbying [2]
-those same California politicians not reigning in PG&E [3]
-and a couple other more minor things.. maybe including people living in risky areas [4]
The sea level change of 3 inches over the last 25 years, while ultimately an issue, is a cop-out for political failings in California right now.
[0] https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2019/10/28/...
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/11/16/californ...
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/23/us/pge-california-politic...
[3] https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/PG-E-plans-near...
[4] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-28/kincade-...