guerrilla

PCI compliance is a joke. That isn't even close to good enough. I'll break all your PCI compliant stuff trivially.

It's nothing like EUV.

> Microsoft does not have that capability. Google does not have that capability. Linux does not have that capability. Amazon does not have that capability. Apple does not have that capability. Cisco does not have that capability. IBM does not have that capability. etc

This is all by choice. They could easily have that capsbility, very unlike EUV.

This is why I quit. You're all (excepting the parent) absolutely delusional. Computer security is literally snake oil. We know how to do things right but we refuse to because it's too expensive.

Reading things like this help me understand how so many people fall for scams. You're so extremely trusting that it's hard to wrap my mind around... I can't relate on any level.

Wow, it's been a while since anyone published anything this interesting.

Almost all, anyway.

By that logic, you think all Muslims should be punished for 9/11.

Not just software but online services. That would help us a lot and is safer anyway.

Nothing like that in Europe? Explain gnomes and ferries.

Sounds great, get more people to go to systemd alternatives :D

Fuck that. Competition and diversity is way better. Anyine who fucks up can just change their laws later.

Incorrect. GNU/Linux includes userland while Linux doesn't.

Increasingly? It sounds like you've never heard of the Open Group or open architecture. Some of the oldest uses are some of the weakest.

Always beleive the record...

Regardless of the reason, it still doesn't have Bluetooth, so I still can't use it.

Does it have Bluetooth, because OpenBSD still doesn't.

They said for new houses.

More articles from the 90s please.

In Sweden we're going to literally have Minority Report style pre-crime registries for potential child molesters. We already have one for potential domestic abusers. Fuck this country. I need to get out of here before it gets worse.

I mean it's definitely possible to call yourself that, but I'd argue no, it's not possible to actually be that.

> Nationalist, sure.

That's pretty far-right by itself. The fact that they want mass deportations should solidify it for you though.

It doesn't take much purity to not be a fascist.

Hmmm. I wonder what the most beefed up OS 9 computer would be... I loved that OS so much.

Damn, you're right. Ugh, everything else is truly molasses.

Umm, no? Citation needed.

Why does it seem like that?

It makes complete sense. Think about the opposite: When you don't feel safe, you'll want to reduce risk taking.

Why not? It did the work. Why should you expect it to be omniscient?

We can rank them based on how much they know and people will gravitate towards those that do know more.

It's a market after all.

I think that's foolish engagement with the technology though. Never panic, always double check. I don't take it as factual. It's just a statistical summary of something it read and it must always be treated as such. In your case, why not just ask 5 other AI's and take a poll?

Yeah, gonna be honest. I ridiculed people for it before, but now I use Google's AI a lot. I haven't used Google in over a decade otherwise and I still don't. I use Brave for search but Google's AI is better than anyone else's for what I do. You heard it guys, I was wrong. I admit it.