New York could be the state, and mayor could just be a word that means leader of an area.
Perhaps that is getting too into the realm of deterritorialisation, but the point being that these concepts are context specific.
529 karma · joined July 17, 2017
New York could be the state, and mayor could just be a word that means leader of an area.
Perhaps that is getting too into the realm of deterritorialisation, but the point being that these concepts are context specific.
> In debian 9, I get 't=ffab' in the search url instead.
Running on debian, I also see this, though I haven't tested on another distro. Is this the OP's distro too?
Also, I've heard some say that if China were to try and develop its own ASML like lithography machine, it would take at least 10 years. I wonder if anyone could throw any light on that claim?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Computing_Since_Democr...
The tooling and community around reproducible builds is growing all the time, and imo we should be insisting on it for things such as government apps.
[1] https://pseudorandom.resistant.tech/obfuscated_apples.html
Surely that's just the data, but resized?
Of course the book showed some failure modes for that, but I wonder if network coverage and latency, as well as "backup driver response time" could be considered good enough, perhaps this sort of model could have an acceptable risk trade-off.
Unsure what their billing looks like, but it works pretty well for them apparently.
> was party to a class action suit with allegations including computer fraud, invasion of privacy, breach of contract, bad faith and seven other statutory violations. According to a news report "OpenFeint's business plan included accessing and disclosing personal information without authorization to mobile-device application developers, advertising networks and web-analytic vendors that market mobile applications" [1]
Of course that doesn't mean anything about the current model of Discord, but good to be aware of.
They are very explicit that this is not permitted [1].
Also, RE :poop: 1. Huffman encoding philosophy - encode frequently used symbols using fewer bytes. 2. Standards are helpful, :poop: is very English-centric, whereas U+1F4A9 is much more interpretable.
[1] https://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#Selection_Factors_I...
People were using emoticons, showing that emoji might be desirable. Some cell phone manufacturers/carriers added their own emoji [1]. They were very popular. Unicode added emoji to the standard, since lots of people were using it.
Not adding emoji would have been _more_ prescriptivist, and since it was desired anyway would have just caused fragmentation.
[1] https://blog.emojipedia.org/correcting-the-record-on-the-fir...
I think Opera might have one too.
[1] <https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2019/01/13/brave-web-br...>
It's not an instant global ban.
Well designed incentives can work better than violence.
"The mirrors guiding this light, made of sandwiched layers of silicon and molybdenum, are ground so precisely that, if scaled to the size of Germany, they would have no bumps bigger than a millimetre" <https://www.economist.com/business/2020/02/29/how-asml-becam...>
+1 on org-roam, and may I add org-roam-server, which visualises that graph in the browser very nicely, in an interactive way: <https://github.com/org-roam/org-roam-server>
The org-roam-server visualisation are really useful for me, since it makes it easier to see what areas have sparsity in them and should be expanded upon. Plus it gives me something more tangible to look at to understand how my research is expanding, there's a bigger sense of "building something". https://github.com/org-roam/org-roam-server
We're still a long way from there RE smartphones, though projects like the PinePhone with hardware switches for things like microphone, camera, WiFi etc, along with a less locked down OS perhaps show a path to achieving this.
Large scale consumer technology has a lot of central planning in it, by nature of how specialised the skills required to produce many aspects of it are.
But central planning has its tail risks and other downsides as history attests.
I'm curious about how communities can be better empowered to make these choices for themselves, be it how moderation is done on social media, or what features are prioritised in consumer electronics.
However the key sharing process still relies on some process like Diffie-Hellman, or sending a PGP encrypted symmetric key generator.
Are there any key advantages to using QKD over these methods?
Though there other organisations doing things, e.g. the PULP Platform: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23768080
I hope that the acquisition doesn't go through, more competition would be great, and perhaps within a decade a wider commercial RISC-V ecosystem could emerge.
The sense of scale when you have depth and head movement had me quaking at a few moments.
Demanding statues remain up so "history is not forgotten", then making moves to ban the discussion of unfavourable history, such as the legacy of empire and such, Churchill's policies during the Bengal famine being the classic example.
However they had some issues with Qt, and have been transitioning to Flutter.
Their technical blog discusses their issues and experiences. https://openprivacy.ca/discreet-log
Things like grouped convolutions were invented for AlexNet as a practical engineering step because of limited GPU memory, but ended up giving nice cost/accuracy trade-off choices.
Perhaps algorithms will move too fast for dedicated hardware to be worth it, but there will be primitives that should be relevant for a while that can be integrated into whatever hardware we use - see Nvidia Tensor Cores, which also include things like sparsity support.