Tiddlywiki with Roam Research like functionality
rr-tw5.github.io
rr-tw5.github.io
As soon as browse nav was busted I totally lost interest in any benefits this app has. If nothing else it’s shoddy development.
I sometimes/often wish there was tags on submissions so that one could avoid even clicking on stories that had this "feature". It would also be great if I could get a feed without, e.g US politics in it.
My default for noScript is to trust sites because browsing the web with javaScript off is both painful and not a privacy improvement.
Moving sites to untrusted blocks annoying pop-ups. And every time I provision a new computer, Wikipedia reminds me to install noScript.
The org-roam-server visualisation are really useful for me, since it makes it easier to see what areas have sparsity in them and should be expanded upon. Plus it gives me something more tangible to look at to understand how my research is expanding, there's a bigger sense of "building something". https://github.com/org-roam/org-roam-server
But it is also very cool concept, it could be much powerful than it is, think smalltalk like VM inside HTML file.
The only thing missing to make it perfect would be a mobile client, but that's not huge deal for how I use it.
The thing I don't like though is that, because it's all in a single giant html file, it is prone to getting huge. Mine is pretty big, and every time I open it (in Firefox or TiddlyDesktop) there's a noticeable delay.
I'll have to look into breaking the monolith up into smaller files to avoid that.
I managed to set it up with my repo using an app called Working Copy, so now I have the full workflow going on all my devices
I prefer something with a degree of spatial orientation, i.e persistent physical location/hierarchy. With the right organization it seems like tiddlywiki can do that.
Full disclosure though: the way collaboration works is optimized to allow for very granular sharing of cards, which is great when you want to share here and there with a wide variety of people (some cards you want to share with friends, some with family, some with your co-workers, some with your clients, etc). But if your goal is to collaborate with co-workers on a shared knowledge base, there are other tools that are probably better suited which we point people towards if that is their use case, like Notion/Craft/etc. Our focus is individual use first and then trying to seamlessly blend collab into that experience.
With that said, we do have a few teams using the platform so YMMV.
The UX is imperfect but the structure is proving useful to me. It’s habit now that if anything needs to be recorded from a meeting, it’s in Agenda, and tied to the meeting, so I lose less context.
A challenge related to remote work, for me, is that if I’m not careful a day’s meetings can blend into each other. I’ve definitely had meetings “escape” me - I was on the call but a week later I can’t recall much and my notes on a paper aren’t as useful as they should be.
...unless this GH-userpage hosted version is special in this regard.
What I usually do if something is hosted on GitHub but doesn’t include a link to the repo itself is I will go to the GH profile that the page is hosted for and look there.
But agree that a simple to find link is preferable.