1,762 karma · joined July 8, 2021
314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions
Immigrant (noun) A person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence.
Per capita emissions is a way to assign relative sin by those who feel guilty about living large.
Bill Gates today, "This is a chance to refocus on the metric that should count even more than emissions and temperature change: improving lives. Our chief goal should be to prevent suffering, particularly for those in the toughest conditions who live in the world’s poorest countries. The biggest problems are poverty and disease, just as they always have been. Understanding this will let us focus our limited resources on interventions that will have the greatest impact for the most vulnerable people.”
1. China 26.16%
2 United States 11.53%
3. India 7.69%
4. Russia 3.75%
5. Brazil 3.16%
6. Indonesia 3.15%
7. Japan 2.15%
8. Iran 2.06%
9. Saudi Arabia 1.60%
10. Canada 1.54%
The top 10 countries account for about ~60% of global CO₂ emissions.
> Why must every service and thing in the US must be a private profit making thing?
It isn't. There are roughly 2 million nonprofits. "Nonprofit organizations play a significant role in the US economy. In 2022, there were 1.97 million nonprofits operating in the US"
And there are endless government programs and millions of government employees. The federal government alone spends over $6 trillion of our money, and money we don't have, per year, and most of it is on mandatory social programs.
"About 60% of all federal spending is categorized as mandatory spending — which amounted to $3.8 trillion last year. This spending is essentially on autopilot because it funds programs whose eligibility rules and benefit formulas are set in law. This consists mostly of programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans care."
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-...
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-...
Not just PG, also Sam Harris, Bill Maher, JK Rowling, Richard Dawkins, and millions of lesser known liberals. Most of whom were and are still too afraid to say anything.
The difference is that this version of Twitter isn't censoring and banning people for wrongthink. The people leaving are self selecting out of the idea gene pool, as opposed to being forced out.
Naval wrote it well, "Rigid ideologues move but the persuadable center does not. So they just move into irrelevance."
It's telling that people who are leaving X are doing so not because they are being censored, but because their political opponents are no longer being censored.
"Today, Apple is carbon neutral for global corporate operations, and by 2030, plans to be carbon neutral across the entire manufacturing supply chain and life cycle of every product."
Musk, Ackman, Altman historically vote Democrat.
Dean didn't propose them as cabinet positions. He made an off the cuff joke.
Most Democrats want a different choice.
Why is competition within the party a bad thing? That anyone trying to compete must be a conspiracy by the others?
Censorship does. Every time. Nazis, communists, every authoritarian or totaliatarian government, rely on censorship and restrict free speech heavily.
Bad ideas require censorship to survive the light of day.
That election was about the working class finally getting one over on the managerial elite.
7 years later and you still don't understand 2016 or refuse to understand it, all while acting smug.