1,019 karma · joined April 9, 2009
https://pastebin.com/raw/5rhv1KjE
I don't understand your complaint.
Genes are long sequences of information. You could easily have quite different genes doing similar things, but if you have the very same gene (sans minor differences) it's just too unlikely to have originated completely independently twice.
The closest thing I can imagine to your scenario is where, because of shared ancestry, 2 species have a certain gene, and then some minor mutation hits both of them, and now they both have some other gene. I suppose that's possible. But they already shared the original gene to start with.
https://ask.metafilter.com/127200/How-do-magazine-publicatio...
Is it really more dangerous to be black and in the wrong place than to be white and in the wrong place? I'm not from your country but this is certainly not the impression one gets; I do know a white guy from Baltimore who would disagree, anyway...
Sure; but my point is, it's really quite unlikely that the one and only unplanned universe would have life, at all. Life then seems like evidence for something...
"It's like marveling about how come that those two [...] people are my parents"
By contrast, I'm not sure what that would be evidence about.
I suggest that most possible universes would have zero regions containing life.
(1) There is a God who decides how things are.
(2) Many universes exist.
Actually I usually feel that the second is simpler than the first, despite my prejudices as a near-Catholic. But I'm increasingly skeptical about efforts to maintain that there's only one, unplanned, universe.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2012/07/05/google-...
Edit: The Telegraph picked this up just now, saying Google are "looking into" it...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/02/27/wine-lovers-cann...
(Exactly how submissions end up at a position other than their natural ranking has always been a bit mysterious to me - should I blame some algorithm thing or malicious actors?)
To get this working:
* Acquire a GTP-capable GUI, such as Sabaki
* Acquire the latest Leela Zero release
* Acquire a recent Leela Zero neural net
* Set up Sabaki to use LZ with the net passed as an argument, e.g. "-t 1 -p 1600 --noponder --gtp -w d16fa4c3801e55ec21e0df7ead67980fe8d4ee49188a3516818207ad28b017a6"
It's a bit of work but nothing too hard. I should mention that this may require a semi-decent GPU (my old GTX 750 works fine).
http://www.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article192244734.html
The victim really does make a fairly unfortunate movement right before he's shot. Still I'm hardly in a position to say how far this mitigates the shooter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhabrot
Actually now that I look at it I think it's the combination of the two. Basically, take a grid of points and iterate them through the Mandelbrot function, plotting where they land at each iteration.
(The Buddhabrot discards all trajectories that don't escape. I don't think this one does.)
It isn't of course.
But suppose there's a country, Foobaria, and "everyone" (hyperbolically speaking) wants to migrate there. But it has notoriously bad weather. In one sense it's true to say that "everyone wants to migrate to a country with bad weather" and in another sense it isn't.
(This is the extension/intension distinction.)
She can still be wrong. And of course it's hard to see inside people's heads and know what they really meant. One can certainly wonder why she phrased it like that -- but then, I don't know what she was asked. I'm having trouble finding this interview; is there a link somewhere?
(Incidentally, since apparently I need to say this, I'll note that Reddit and Twitter users "gort" are not me.)
http://www.weeklystandard.com/a-beating-in-berkeley/article/...
I'm not sure that's right, everything was working correctly, it just didn't read out a low-probability move very deep.
But if you mean the last victory against the very strongest, you're probably right.
I've not read the article yet, but an answer to this question is, "not at the very start".