468 karma · joined December 14, 2011
I wonder how much of requiring a computer science degree is simply because the people hiring have computer science degrees. Seems like a self perpetuating insiders club.
The reason they do this has more to do with the fluctuating price though as they can't risk the value dropping after they sell something.
Addresses are protected by hashing a public key to the bitcoin address (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Technical_background_of_version_1...). If you've always sent coins to new addresses like the hierarchical deterministic wallets do then your public key is only exposed after you spend the coins, so you are not susceptible to a cracking attempt on the public key.
I got it and liked the image for the project, I just think it's a little crazy this is a controversial issue and wanted to see what hacker news thought.
With headphones though while something may sound more accurate it might not be enjoyable to listen to. It can be too harsh to our ears and cause listening fatigue. While the Sennheiser HD800 are a great pair of headphones I find them very difficult to listen to on a neutral amp for long periods of time. The only way I could really enjoy them was to get a warmer tube amp. In the end I replaced them with the Audeze LCD-3 which I would argue are less accurate headphones but are far more enjoyable.
It forces you to make sure interruptions are actually worth dealing with vs putting them off till after the timer is up.
https://support.plex.tv/hc/en-us/articles/200250387-Streamin...
It is not using DynamoDB under the covers. It basically uses a fork of MySQL for the front end and their own storage layer built from scratch on the backend. It does use concepts from the Dynamo white paper for redundantly storing the data to disk which removes the need for MySQL style replication. But it's not using the DynamoDB service currently offered from Amazon.
In the case where you are storing the bitcoins with coinbase and not converting it they just need to make sure they have the bitcoins on hand. Forcing coinbase to both hold bitcoin and USD to cover the value of those bitcoins makes no sense.
The bigger issue is think about how close you would have to hold the watch up to your face to make it that big in real life. If you did that you'd be able to see the pixels but you wouldn't hold it that close.
http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/hodinkee-apple-watch-review has much better real life shots that mirror what I saw at the Apple store.
I got the same sense from reading reviews, most seemed negative on it, like it was unfinished and not ready for primetime (wait till version 2 or 3 most would say).
I can tell you after going into the store and trying it out I left thinking it was a great product. The fit and finish is top notch and the UI is smooth and responsive. I couldn't test watch kit apps out so that might be an issue, but that'll be resolved once Apple releases a separate SDK for running on the watch which they said they would do later this year.
I'd say if you were previously worried by the reviews go check it out in person and you might be surprised.
Now with Synchronous Invoke you can have a backend for a mobile app live fully on AWS Lambda. The benefit being you pay by the millisecond for compute time used vs having to keep EC2 nodes up and paying for underutilized instances.
Assuming an average kh/watt of 2.333 [1] and the total network hashrate of 68 GH/s [2] we can see the network uses about 30 Megawatts of electricity. As a comparison Microsoft uses 250 Megawatts to power for their datacenters [3]. So it is wasteful, yes, but who's to say it's any worse than running datacenters so I can play battlefield 4 with my friends on xbox live which also provides no benefit for charity.
[1]: most ATI cards use this much per kh (https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison), this ignores the newer ASIC hardware that is orders of magnitude more efficient
[2]: http://bitinfocharts.com/dogecoin/
[3]: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/161772-microsoft-now-has-...
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/12/05/in-the-murky-world-of...
I don't believe that, I think we can see that people are willing to sell it when there is something they want.
The volatility actually ends up being a good thing in this regard because sometimes you are better off purchasing other goods with bitcoin, sometimes you are better off holding.
If the value eventually balances out and is truly deflationary against inflation then I don't think people are going to lose sleep over selling bitcoins that are going up 3% each year the same way they don't worry about taking money out of a savings account to buy something they don't really need.