952 karma · joined November 22, 2016
Words do matter, but intentions matter more.
And while I don't wish to be overly prickly about it since you are obviously approaching this from a place of good intentions, you might want to read up on what we call the "model minority myth"[2]. The "success" of the Japanese American community in surmounting the challenges of the exclusion and incarceration experience has been used repeatedly as a cudgel in US cultural and political discourse wielded against other groups for their perceived failures in achieving the "American Dream." From what you have written here, I know that is not what you support.
1. https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Immigration_Act_of_1952/ 2. https://densho.org/learn/model-minority-myth/
He embodies so much of the genuine intellectual curiosity, creativity, and joy of the early Internet. A really good human!
> The point is that a liberal pluralistic society needs to learn to accommodate people with different worldviews. A key part of that is getting people to understand that their own worldview is subjective, and that other worldviews are possible and acceptable.
And, to state the obvious, this is specifically why the "outrage engagement economy" incentive models that drive almost all of our at-scale communications channels (Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, FoxNews) are inherently dangerous to that liberal pluralistic society. For all of the lip service that these players pay to values like, "civic discourse" and "the town square," they only exist by subdividing their users into "affinity groups," and then pushing them content that triggers maximum emotional response and affirmation of group identity.
The platforms don't simply reinforce commitment to particular worldviews; over the last few decades, we have seen them create worldviews to increase user engagement and ad revenue.
I love this so much
It seems like we resolved the problem, by blocking an ASN in Singapore (16509 - AMAZON-02) that hosted Bytedance IPs spraying us with spider requests. But of course, correlation always implies causation[1].
I'd be curious if any other CF customers have seen anything similar?
OK, it's probably Twitter; but still, I'm sure as hell not buying anything tied to Meta, either.
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...
https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm/segments/curious-ca...
1. https://www.seattle.gov/civilrights/civil-rights-enforcement...
https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2023/08/despite-progres...
And, yeah, the software is hot garbage.
Funny -- I've ridden the ferries a lot and never really thought about it.
1. https://www.sailnet.com/threads/double-ended-ferries-which-e...
1) The ebooks available through IA's Open Library are offered under a controlled lending scheme similar to a commercial service like OneDrive and Amazon. Users are limited to 10 books at a time, and can borrow the items for up to 14 days. After that period, the ebooks -- which use Adobe's DRM tech -- are disabled.
2) The number of "copies" available for lending are restricted to the actual number of physical copies that IA has in storage, permanently out of circulation.
3) Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan and the rest of the publishing industry is fairly hell-bent on "squashing lending" that doesn't happen through their exclusive and extremely lucrative ebook channels. The steep increases in pricing along with tightening restrictions on access have public library institutions such as the ALA concerned about the very existence of book lending in the future.
4) In their PR blitz, the publishers talk a lot about the "National Emergency Library," which did allow for unlimited lending during a 12-week period at the beginning of the pandemic; but the suit is not confined to this short-lived program.