Journalists with corporate sponsors are just advertisers by another name.
1,049 karma · joined February 28, 2019
Journalists with corporate sponsors are just advertisers by another name.
> Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter.
What’s bad for the 24-hour news cycle is good for Democracy.
> I was taking ibuprofen at this point in the day because my brain was literally unable to comprehend this revelation. How have I made it 25 years in life...
> icon-less organisation with a cryptic name
Oh my god what if they're foreign? Isn't it terrifying to think about foreigners? Better take that fear into the voting booth with you.
Running software is always more of a performance than an institution.
These people make take some unscientific ideas to their graves but they will also take a lot of fear and hatred with them.
Going from “all about Jobs” to “look at our cutting-edge emoji designs” is a nice encapsulation of Apple history. I know that many people hope the period from Jobs’ death to Ives’ departure was just a phase. But it feels like we’re down to the wire product-wise. The new MBP is a nice start but before long the iPhone SE will reach end-of-life and I just don’t want a flat brick with three cameras and no audio port.
That is a weird statistic to choose for professing a proof of viability. I’m sure cancer has more than 4000 mentions on PubMed, does that mean cancer is good for me?
Why not cite a review of relevant studies instead? Quoting a meaningless piece of information is suspicious and lazy.
This whole thing is satire, right?