733 karma · joined February 20, 2007
We did at my school.
Plus, having a blog on its own domain is easier than giving everyone a link to http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=edw519, which is awkward, and which includes the clutter of shorter comments, other people's comments, up/down arrows, etc.
1. When I read, I'm interested in an author, not an author's readers. (But the links back to HN are good in case I want that.) As in the last paragraph of this article: http://daringfireball.net/2010/06/whats_fair
2+3. I prefer reading one post at a time, with a straightforward ToC. Tags are distracting. If I'm looking for a post on a certain topic, I use a search engine.
4. Even if the title's lame at first, it can become cool if comes to stand for something good.
Obviously you could just have a water
This is more about hacking other people than it is about diet. Managing other people's impressions of you without having to be upfront about what you're doing.
Maybe we shouldn't suppose so much.
He pays attention enough to start comment threads about it.
Maybe because it's obvious. The point of the article is that breaking copy/paste, whatever the reason, doesn't work: "Who, when they paste such text and find this “Read more:” attribution line appended, doesn’t just delete it (and wonder how it got there)?"
By using a different language or by writing simpler code, you can avoid every complexity mentioned, so it's not really essential complexity. And programmers in any language can create these problems, except "the intrinsic Python OO worldview," and maybe "weird library APIs". So this sounds like it's really just a criticism of Python.
And that's what makes it more useful to more people.