That is literally a specific advice to write low-quality "porn" content that stimulates superficially and then trigger an anger/betrayal reaction.
These "tricks" are copied straight from a used car sales lot, and we hated them there too.
252 karma · joined February 11, 2013
That is literally a specific advice to write low-quality "porn" content that stimulates superficially and then trigger an anger/betrayal reaction.
These "tricks" are copied straight from a used car sales lot, and we hated them there too.
3.5% mortgage -> 50K/yr * 100% / 3.5%/yr = $1.5M house price
interest rates are so low these days, you can spend 50% more on principal for the same interest, compared to 2006 when rates were ~6.25%.
tokenadult, do you have an Ed.D or Ph.D in Education? Or maybe something related to Social Work?
Did you know that this communication style, which you use rather consistently in your HN posts, and which is prevalent in the education community, is poorly-received rather outside that community?
Not saying your style is wrong, just that is extremely grating outside the Ed world. It sits in the uncanny valley of faux-familiarity, and as such it breeds mistrust.
That's how I do problems like that, too (I am not a genius mathematician), and it is exactly the sort of thinking that kids should be doing all through K-12. Estimation, intuitive reasoning, analogy, pattern matching, logic, etc.
This is barely touched in standard geometry text books. 2-column proofs and all that.
But most people don't notice it, and it deserves far more treatment. Many of the smartest people I know attended special gifted programs in K-12 that did teach formal logic and informal critical thinking skills.
(correlation != causation, though)
https://www.google.com/search?q=abortion
https://www.google.com/search?q=taxi
Or if you were willing to type more than 2 words into the search box before blaming Google for failing to read your mind, while you simultaneously tell Google to stop trying to read your mind.
and Google Search is basically Watson.
(It uses that horrid layout with broken scrolling that the NYT popularized with its Snowfall story.)
I buy a shirt for $7, sell it for $10, and get $3 dollars profit and $7 to buy another shirt.
I was genuinely confused about the $10-3=$7 he was claiming he could use to buy more shirts, when it was already used to pay wholesale for the first shirt.
But maybe that was confusion about Return on Invested Capital, not confusion about margin.
Amazon was not profitable for 10 years, because revenue did not exceed variable+fixed costs. But revenue exceeded variable costs. They had losses for 10 years, but had positive margine.
Public schools love the international student tuition money these days, it's such a farce, turning "public" education on its head.