fullmoon

You’re leaving lot of noise on the table if you only look with one eye.

I’m surprised that so many people can tickle their social itch over the internet.

There is nothing about the dynamics involved that I’d consider social.

Interaction is mostly with total strangers, almost always in text form (no subtext, no facial expression, no body language).

Comments are written at people, not to people — to illicit support for one’s position or condemnation of the opposing one.

Social networks : Being social = Sock : Loving spouse

Sufficiently privileged to know about the importance of sleep?

Like with “six-minute-abs”, the idea that something hard, but (for many) fulfilling is achievable without any sacrifice is an idea that’s easily sold to people that want to believe it.

Have a good luck in how many feminists regard women that choose to become full-time mothers and you’ll see that it’s not that simple.

Why would you choose to read it in this way?

How is sharing some (correct) information about biological realities non-consensual?

It’s very different to know that eggs become less fertile with age and being aware how rapidly this happens even during a woman’s 30s.

I’m not sure why you’d love to see bubbles and “misinformation” here.

According to Krashen's language acquisition models only input matters, and typing is a very ineffective mode of reading.

Culturally? That would be interesting to think through.

I can be sold on the idea that covering one face (by any means) removes a lot of communication and social clues that are inherently human.

But control?

Please consider seeking the help of mental health counseling both for your own sake and for those close to you.

I’m well aware.

Yet we’ve been hearing since the beginning of 2021 that they’ve been proven to have been much more efficient by the coalition parliament which has come up with this idea.

Yes, Germany is one of those few outliers in the 27 EU countries / Europe 44.

Land mass or self-perceived importance from within notwithstanding.

The result of Germany’s remarkable interventions is remarkable in its mediocrity.

We Europeans are continually surprised that talking about masks is still a thing.*

Except for 1 or 2 outlier countries masking is over.

* Unless they are familiar with U.S. politics

Austria has mandated N95s for months.

No improvement in comparison to neighboring countries could be demonstrated.

Mostly because it was pure theater and no attempt at proof was even made.

Is this an Ayn Rand quote out of her novels? It sounds that way but I can’t find it.

Reflect on the reasons why you’ve just written this very comment.

You might be surprised.

This is the fallacy fallacy.

How does infant mortality help us to reason that we should drink beyond thirst?

Why would one regret not spending more time on social media?

I’ve only be learning for a year or so — will the mapping of tenses from Latin to English ever make sense?

Medieval Latin isn’t really that much different than latin from the classical period.

So what? They might be in the books or twiddle their thumbs but union or not they’re is no right to location or remote system access post termination.

I live in a modern central European nation.

There is nothing dystopian about denying people that are no longer employed office access.

If the layoff of this team elicits anger from the “you’re the problem” crowd then Musk is doing something right.

Adding a text replacement from “fuck” to “fuck” (General - Keyboards - Text Replacement) allows you to swear again.

How’s your jaw? Did you start grinding your teeth / clenching your jaw?

Your symptom cluster is very similar to me since a long long time before Covid.

I’ve recovered my sense of sense and test within a week after the first onset of symptoms.

The good news is that some of us have instruments attached do those view holes that are capable to reason beyond the URL.

“Anti-racism” is, in fact, racist.

Your last paragraph points towards some internalized racial stereotypes.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking it’s anything else by some people that manipulate language.

One good example of such a person is Hannah-Jones and her fraudulent 1619 project, who fits all of those attributes except for historian.

Since “Implicit bias” could not have been proven to actually exist your charge is a direct personal one based on nothing concrete at all.