There is nothing dystopian about denying people that are no longer employed office access.
There is nothing dystopian about denying people that are no longer employed office access.
All our contracts are managed by unions and you can't just fire someone out of the blue, there's notice periods on both sides (unless there's just cause for termination)
Yes, and most of the time the fired employee will be sent home during his notice period, so im not sure what you are talking about?
The thing is, mass layoffs are often discussed widely in Europe since its mostly blue collar employees and the unions and politicians are often trying to prevent the layoffs.
Mass layoffs (or some kind of forced unpaid leave) is typically something that happens for blue collared jobs when there is a reduction of demand for their products.
The twitter case is different, though. Twitter was a hostile takeover (even in the end, it was the company that forced the transaction). The takeover was not done for economic reason (or that was what was claimed), but because the new owner wanted to radically change the values of the company.
For employees that base their personal identity on those old values, this makes them natural enemies of the new owner. When Musk carries the sink in, he is like an enemy warlord accepting the surrender of an enemy tribe.
After a short tally, the enemy warlord lets half the prisoners go, after disarming them (takes away access to accounts and buildings), while the other half are allowed to join his forces, if they desire to.
This is probably the way this had to go. Letting everyone keep their access to the infra would be crazy. Now the question that remains, is how much does he have to pay those that got fired.
https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/xgoouz/americans_ha...
Also we can have a heart surgery here without going bankrupt.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/poverty-r...
That conveniently leaves out the dystopian parts. Being logged off remotely, no personal communication, no delay, &c.