Eight glasses of water a day excessive for most people, study suggests
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Of all the overzealous health advice we give this one seems pretty minor. The article is saying that we "require" six glasses. The article also says there is no downside to your health for drinking more.
You can poison yourself by drinking too much water. Can happen amongst very fit people doing a lot of exercise who think this means they have to down 10 litres of water in half an hour.
10 litres was an exaggeration of course. I think like 6 or something in a couple of hours is dangerous from the doctors I worked with?
This is from a group of fitness obsessed people doing very arduous exercise.
Like water it’s fine until you’re swallowing pill after pill.
Also, tendon injury/tendonitis seems linked to ibuprofen use. It may delay other kinds of healing (bone fractures, etc)
I'd also wager the amount of people with health related issues due to too much water consumption is very little compared to too little water consumption.
https://www.abc27.com/news/entertainment/doctors-believe-bru...
A couple of years ago, I researched and wrote up an article on the effects of drinking additional water and weight loss. I was just curious because I was dieting and consistently read advice to drink lots of water to help aid dieting.
tldr: "thermogenic" (calorie-burning) effects of additional water intake are mostly negligible and based on old, non-replicated research. There may be very modest benefits for obese people during dieting, but the research is unclear. No other clear benefits that have a solid backing of research (that I could find).
If your pee is clear, then you're probably hydrated just fine.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10230169/
There's no sense in any particular quantity. If you're thirsty then drink some water. That's it.
If you apply the same logic to hunger, for example, even more people would be obese if they ate when they felt hungry, or if they followed their ancestors' instincts to gorge until full whenever the opportunity arose.
It's possible that we've historically survived in a local maxima of resource scarcity, and that "optimal" metabolic performance exists in a place beyond that, where resources are less scarce.
How does infant mortality help us to reason that we should drink beyond thirst?
Thirst is an emergency signal not a useful metric to depend on planning water intake.
Why not? Humans generally avoided arid climates until fairly recently, so I wouldn't consider the idea of drinking 2 liters per day as absurd on its face.
Also, one of our killer features is the ability to cool our bodies down by sweating. That makes us incredible endurance hunters, who can eventually exhaust even much larger and faster prey by simply following it around until it collapses from excess heat. But that requires drinking water.
Depending on where you live, you will sweat out a lot more water on a daylong hunt.
But in semi-arid climates, where streams are rare, animals tend to gather around watering holes, so that might actually be the best place to start your hunt.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FwdqFHBaPwY
TL;DW: marketing by drink producers invented a problem to sell people who pursue healthy habits bottled water.