But I agree with the general sentiment, that the numbers are an oversimplification: it's not only a matter of finance; the two products are different.
24 karma · joined January 25, 2024
But I agree with the general sentiment, that the numbers are an oversimplification: it's not only a matter of finance; the two products are different.
The interests of the involved parties must always be taken into account.
The 2nd is like embossing, the 1st is like stencil (like other types of photolithography, but the photomask touches the wafer).
according to the article, this was just to get them hooked at first, but they kept doing it later:
> After the rats were trained to push the level for sugar, Lignier changed the experiment's parameters. Sometimes taking a picture would yield a piece of sugar, and sometimes would not.
> Nevertheless, the rats kept on jamming the button, taking dozens of selfies. After awhile, he says they largely stopped bothering to eat the sugar, even when it came out.
i think i agree with this,
> I think "everywhere all the time" AI for chat, driving, coding, or medical image analysis etc is a pipe dream absolutely.
but i'm not sure i'd put medical image analysis in this group. i mean, aren't there already several examples of software outperforming humans in this domain?