700 karma · joined June 26, 2017
For something like texting/RCS, there are thousands of phones being tested thousands of time by thousands of people with multiple additional checkpoints (ODM, Google, Carriers). It's a core functionality so it's extremely tightly verified.
RCS was first implemented about three years ago for phones so it's shocking that this kind of bug happened now. I also worked on the initial infrastructure for this so I can't imagine how this bug was even introduced. My bet goes to it being a server-side issue, especially since it's carrier-specific, and not a software bug.
Some companies do still look at GPAs. Others specifically indicate they're looking for people from "top-tier" schools. Out of context, this means you'll have more opportunities if you have a higher GPA and if you attended a top-tier school.
I didn't know Chromecast could go down on a large-scale like this because I would imagine it would just be something functional within my own network. Now I know.
Given all the expectation of its product and the importance of ML/AI, it makes sense this was impossible.
Although it's extremely impressive, all the restrictions will definitely make this less appealing to the audience (shown in the Reddit thread comments).
Without breaking NDA, it was something along the lines of "Why would Uber let customers wait longer?"
It's an interesting product problem but I felt that it would be more relevant for an economist to analyze, given that it's more of a supply/demand equilibrium challenge.
I hope this is not the reason why Jawbone is undergoing liquidation and Fitbit IPOed.(I'm sure there are many more reasons, but it'd be shocking these stolen trade secrets were contributing factors).
I'm also going through this process right now, and it's a lot more work than I've envisioned. Others have said this, but make sure not to burn out - I'm trying to best.
One bad thing about this system for Android is how much control Google has over permissions - for example, their own built-in Shazam...
There has to be a more comprehensive study done on its neurotoxicity. Or more studies in general. But who will pay for it and why?
Considering that one-way flights at its cheapest are $49 + a negligible price for TSA-pre, is the value proposition the convenience of a subscription model + prices that aren't affected by seasonal trends (being able to book whenever with a consistent price)? Are there any hidden ones that I'm missing?
At least for the US, would it be possible to learn from their success(dominance over other countries) in baseball/basketball and apply the same structure to Men's football(soccer)? Is it possible that the genetic variance that the US has could be an advantage in the future? Or is it impossible due to culture? (Higher chance of making money in football/basketball, etc)