724 karma · joined March 24, 2023
df = df.dropna()
Wow
Edit: more seriously though… this is a non deterministic pipeline that seems to mutate your data in place with no indication of what it did.
There’s no evidence that this stuff can blow elsewhere at concentrations sufficient to cause harm very far (maybe a couple dozen miles). Hence, “highly localized”.
This study from 2020 found an 89% increase, which is a large effect size, but it’s still just 1’s of people per 100,000 more getting cancers. It’s not a massive public health hazard. War is complicated.
Regardless the effects are highly localized. You’re fine if you’re not nearby.
If you’re concerned about radioactivity you can just look at your own link. The measurements of radiation are all that matters. Not some scary cause. As your link indicates, levels are fine.
Elon musk saying he would sell his shares because he was backing out of an agreement to purchase those shares at an inflated price is obviously going to drop the price. This is not the same thing as a random shareholder who happens to own stocks and wants to divest some.
If you want to sell all your shares for X, you’d be an idiot for not selling some of them for more than X. This is not difficult to understand.
Acquisition offers for less than market value are extremely rare, absent non public information. They are called takeunders. They generally only happen when a company is on deaths door. Which lyft is not. It would be seen as really dumb to offer less than market value in an acquisition bid. Stop making up rhetoric as if this were a normal reasonable thing to do. It’s not.
> Fund the journalism we need now
> We need you now more than ever. In turbulent times, it is crucial that reliable media remains available to everyone. That is why we depend on your support to keep our journalism accessible and independent. From economic uncertainty to political polarization, the challenges our society is facing today are too important for half-truths.
> At The Walrus, the future of journalism is funded by engaged citizens like you. Together, we can preserve the integrity of Canadian media and ensure that our democracy thrives. Will you join us?
Anyway. I personally hope we see more orgs that are dedicated to niche topics. They do one thing and you go to them to read their one thing, like the institute of war for Ukraine (and iran/Iraq/Taiwan to lesser degrees).
Most news will find its way into the public consciousness if it’s important without journalism.
If you own $1B shares of Lyft, and you think it would be great to sell them for less than X, you’d be pretty dumb for not selling whatever you can at X. The fact that they are not doing this suggests they would not be happy to sell for less than X.
This is true even if the selling of your holdings causes the market price to drop.
Have a neutral mutually beneficial idea? Let’s contextualize it as a divisive political issue that is championed by the political leader you hate the most.