158 karma · joined August 31, 2014
I’m not knowledgeable enough to read between the lines, but is this a veiled reference to Go? If so, what about Go is intentionally not smart, and why? (Or language X)
Agreed about the disruption in this space.
> They don't like users configuring the aids themselves
I get the feeling most users don't want to configure the aids themselves, and even if they did, wouldn't feel comfortable doing it or don't have the ability or audiology knowledge needed.
Later on you mention how helping with hearing loss is not quick or straightforward, which seems to support that the default of encouraging sessions with an expert is right approach, at least to start.
Maybe a search engine is in the works already (or a deal to buy Duck Duck Go).
Another consideration is your point that preventing ads will harm advertisers’ income. In some cases, hurting income is an acceptable loss, but in others where the service is sustained by advertising, less so.
Perhaps another compromise could be to allow apps that do not accept the tracking prompt to only access basic functionality, with an explanation that the tracking supports their premium service. That’s a very different world for Facebook and others.
I have also been at a larger company, so you bring up a good point about fighting for work. I also think this is right.
1. If you win the fight for high visibility work, that's a good sign that you're the right person for the job. It wouldn't make sense for the company to have you work on something for your own benefit over the company.
2. You may opt not to fight and discover other problems to work on that have strong potential for being high visibility. Maybe that's something relegated to PMs or eng management, where the engineer might feel helpless to the given assignments, but that's more of a culture problem. I think politics increases when there's less work/budget/praise than there are people, which is more situational than cultural, in my opinion.
Material is well done, except I really don't like the actual design. Cupertino looks more like iOS 7 than iOS 14 and lacks something…
I used to imagine how to improve game play in the X-wing series, but not really outside the existing mechanics (just tweaking max speed, weapons load, or shielding). I have such fond memories. I started out in web programming largely to the web community around the game.
The Mighty Eighth reminds me of a take on Star Wars space combat game play that I wished was explored more, like the gunner role in a Y-wing, or what it's like to be the crew a Corellian Corvette taking on other similarly sized ships.
I just couldn't stand the blurry text, so now I'll give it a go and switch back to Firefox. Although, the colors look far more saturated than they should be, like the orange Hacker News navigation bar.
The comment about moms blocking YouTube is a bit ridiculous. Seems hard to believe likelihood of finding one could be higher than the likelihood of finding a kid who can work around it.
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/youtube-for-kids-videos-prob...
As for increased number of addicts, I think the fact that there are technology addicts where there didn't used to be (before tech), should be a sufficient logical claim.
Speaking of which, do you have data on your specific claim on the resilience of human psychology against negative tech/media experiences?
The background was that I couldn't find any out-of-box solutions or substantial documentation on how to implement this correctly for the "premium media streaming scenario. I became so frustrated that I was determined to open source the solution and save others some burden.
The goals are… - provide a working solution for App Store subscriptions - make it extensible with listener implementations - share best practices - involve the community in making this as helpful as possible
Would love any feedback on this, whether product, technical, or project/marketing. Thanks!
Are you saying a sophisticated brand agency would intentionally brand worse because it's the expectation for a successful programming language? If I'm a design agency, I would reject bad design even if it's expected and commonplace. Although, there might be good features in the bad design, which I think should be kept.
In the end, this brand guide is not just about the language. The first section is all about identifying the audience and helping communication in the community, which I think is more important than the details mentioned later on (colors/typography/logo/etc).
> Go was created by a team of programmers who value honest, open communication, without exaggeration or excess. Our dialogue with one another and the broader community adheres to the following
I don't really believe that this statement is true, but I think expressing this aspiration is important.
I think the Rust language website is quite good too, since it has all the details of the code of conduct and contribution info, but it's not a fair comparison since it's a superset of brand guidelines.
My complaint would be that the Rust website actually has a far superior visual design than the Go website, but I don't think there's a problem Go's brand book. My 2 cents, or 5. :\