143 karma · joined March 7, 2019
If you’re a resident of California qualifying should not be an issue. See “State-based admission limitations” on the admissions requirements page if you’re a resident of another state as you may not qualify. [1]
I recommend reaching out to Kayla Rolicheck, the program advisor, to see how you qualify or if you have questions about the program. She’s been with the program since its inception and is very knowledgeable. [2]
Please feel free to reach out to me directly if you have other questions about the process. I’m by no means an expert but if I can be helpful I’m happy to answer any questions. I’ll leave a link to my email in my profile.
[0] https://csumb.edu/scd/cs-online-degree-completion-bs [1] https://csumb.edu/scd/admissions-requirements [2] tel: +1(831)582-3621; press 3 for the program
"Monitor" might be a misnomer, here, in that the monitor isn't expected to be actively watching what the truck is doing; rather the monitor would be expected to respond to infrequent issues and maybe handle off-highway driving to and from shipping and receiving facilities.
Automating large parts of the driving process would make the job easier and more desirable. More people would be willing to work as monitors, which would increase truck availability and lower rates.
There’s also the possibility that a monitor could do other work while the truck drove. Team drivers already do this; the passive driver occupies herself when not driving by reading or even dispatching other loads.
The monitor would be in place to manage the last-mile driving and any other technically-challenging aberrations on the route. Human skill and judgement would still be required, just for much shorter periods.
It’s not the same process as the autonomous urban driving being attempted by Waymo et al. Driving from Phoenix to Dallas on the highway is far simpler than driving around Phoenix.
This would be more likely for smaller-format discount retail like, e.g., the Dollar Store or a restaurant supply chain.
In my view the monitor would be a driver with standard knowledge and experience who could drive if the autonomous system encountered an edge case or for last-mile, i.e., from the freeway to the shipping or receiving facility.
Under those circumstances a load traveling ten hours with six hours of loading and unloading time would require two hours of active work and fourteen hours of standby.
Any driver would accept a lower rate for this kind of arrangement.
“Regulatory constraints” refers to FMCSA’s hours-of-service rules, the legal limit to how many hours a driver may operate a truck in a given day. [1]
[0] https://www.npr.org/2018/01/09/576752327/trucking-industry-s...
[1] https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations/hours-service/summary-...
A monitor can be paid less than a driver, as they’re doing less work, and can respond to onsite issues more promptly and accurately than could a remote one.
I love this community.
[0] https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/...
I’m inclined to think workers who would have turned to payday lenders in the past to pay for groceries or a cell service bill might instead wait until after their next work day to initiate an instant deposit. It’s easier to do so in an app than it is to visit a payday lender, after all.
I would be especially interested in seeing banks offer or partner with services like these as a way of helping unbanked low-income workers access financial services.
Super promising. Especially considering how many parts of the state face zero power this summer when PG&E tapers transmission in fire-prone areas [0, 1].
Not that power is normally that reliable in rural parts of the state. I had a friend in rural Sierra county who would regularly experience intermittent black-outs. If the line running down the canyon to Sierra City (pop. 221) was knocked out by a fallen tree it could take a day or two for PG&E to restore power.
[0] https://www.pge.com/en_US/safety/emergency-preparedness/natu...
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/pg-es-radical-plan-to-prevent-w...
Trader Joe’s, Aldi, Lidl, and to a lesser-extent Costco, are revolutionizing the grocery business in much the same that Walmart and the A&P did. Except they sell high-quality store brands and offer fewer, better choices to customers with less in-store cruft.
Americans spend a smaller proportion of their income on food now than they did a generation ago; roughly 10% now compared to 17.5% in 1960 [0]. It’s exciting to imagine that average falling to 5%.
And it’s even more exciting to imagine other consumer spending categories falling relative to income, e.g., transportation and housing.
[0] https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/03/02/389578089/yo...
California (39.5 MM) will likely be “larger” than Texas (28.7 MM) for some time, despite a much lower growth rate.
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/estimate...
It’s completely unsurprising that the Department of Transportation wants the funding back after the state downsized the project from nationally-significant to regionally-significant.
Managing an enormous seller marketplace is almost as fraught as shopping on one. I can understand why Amazon wants to act as the broker in every aspect of the retail transaction. As a third-party broker you’re shielded from much of the liability while reaping much of the benefit.
Unfortunately, third-party brokers are limited in the kinds of interventions that first-parties can bring to bear during a service failure. Walmart, Target, et al., can fix a wayward transaction much more quickly and cheaply than Amazon can by virtue of maintaining many well-staffed warehouses, i.e., stores.
One request: Make it possible to filter out sources. I never look at stories that have, e.g., Medium, The New York Times, or The Guardian as their source. Let me filter those out.
If you’re running a SAAS business you can admire it; if you publish a blog or editorial site by all means copy it.
Interesting retailing concept. I do wonder if Japanese consumers will ever tire of the novelty. Then again, 29 years of growth might suggest otherwise.
[0] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-don-quijote/japans-...
I’ve opted-out by deleting my account and choosing not to visit the Twitter site. I’ve done the same with Facebook following the same principle. I won’t suggest that my decision had no costs; I miss out on conversations I could learn from and have to be more intentional about reaching out to people in my network. But the costs are far outweighed by the benefits: less frustration, less anxiety, less FOMO.
I highly recommend opting-out to anyone who’s become fed up with the platforms, their conduct or policies, or the way they are made to feel using their products.
I think most of us would assume that wolf pups have an innate scavenging ability; this is probably wrong.
[0] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aff0/dca479ca58868890d903cd...
My guess is most humans run two quick analyses: 1) what is the cost of seeing if the short tool can be made to work and 2) what is the cost of retrieving the more distant long tool using the short tool. Human/primate efforts would seem to begin with tool use before escalating to metatool use.
All seven of the New Caledonian crows in the experiment engaged in metatool use on their first attempt; only some of them successfully retrieved the second tool but none of them trialed simple tool use.
[0] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098220...
I don’t doubt the United States could hold its own in a rebalanced international order but I’m less optimistic about the Europeans and even less so about our allies in East Asia.