119 karma · joined November 26, 2021
Let me guess. SAMA had the classic sku/$/hr saas pricing.
Any automation tool could result in a regression which may generate invalid numbering. At any rate, I doubt a court would ignore mens rea.
One example: https://github.com/apple/corenet/tree/main/projects/clip#tra...
https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/publications/open_m...
https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NTIA-RFC-Met...
> The EU AI Act negotiations ended. One contentious issue was the regulation of foundation models, particularly open source ones.
> Kudos to the French, German, and Italian governments for not giving up on open source models.
> Juicy part: "The legislation ultimately included restrictions for foundation models but gave broad exemptions to “open-source models,” which are developed using code that’s freely available for developers to alter for their own products and tools. The move could benefit open-source AI companies in Europe that lobbied against the law, including France’s Mistral and Germany’s Aleph Alpha, as well as Meta, which released the open-source model LLaMA."
There is a distinction to be made in "knowing how it works" on architecture vs weights themselves.
https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites...
But the bigger problem with the article IMO is the fact that this is degrowth. Why is the electricity consumption important? Carbon is the real metric. Big server operators (meta, aws, azure, gcp) already either are 100% zero-carbon powered or on track to be.
Regardless, if grid needs to add capacity for EVs, heat pumps, other electrification goals, why are servers (probably low impact) important?