1,974 karma · joined June 21, 2017
1: https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenGL-Refpages/gl4/html/gl...
The problem with your argument is that it makes too many assumptions. We know nothing about the nature of the simulator, nor do we have any reason to believe that (assuming we are not in a simulator) the universe works the way it does for any particular reason. Furthermore, the isomorphism you point out between the the physical world and computers are much more easily explained if you flip the causality chain: we are humans living in this world, and we modeled computers after ourselves and our surroundings.
Not to say that we can't possibly be living in a simulation, but rather that the only way that can be shown, or even evidenced, is through concrete evidence. Thought experiment is insufficient evidence.
Doesn't the MIT license require that it be reproduced with all derivative works, including the copyright line (which includes the author)?
AFAIK adam is going to work on it, once he finishes up with the android stuff.
This makes the maintainers' job a bit harder, but not by a lot, and as a user I find it a nice medium of stability and progress.
That's metaphysics, not science.
> Do we orbit the Sun or the image of the Sun? In other words, what's the speed of gravity?
The image. Speed of gravity is the same as the speed of light.
As for holding in your lap, the cord on mine (kinesis advantage) is long enough that I can comfortably take it off my desk and put it in my lap. YMMV, of course, depending on how you have your desktop set up, but I doubt that's an insurmountable problem.