eaenki

prolly cus shes kinda good looking to sam

just buy homes from individuals. or rent luxury homes and and sub rent them. there are many individuals who will turn a blind eye on their real estate for a 30% premium.

hello, may I get the credit please? <3 I’m in a bad situation :|

2% is just inflation. so you’d have the same $1 buying power in 900 bc as today.

5% and your argument would make sense. but besides revolutions, I think it’s hard because of variance to hit +5% 1000 times in a row and never -99%. you only need 10 bad years at -10% to go down 99%. from there to get back up you need a 10.000% and that’s not gonna happen.

the best bet as a theoretical thought, would be to buy useful natural resources and hide it in many different jurisdictions, as well as buying land.

what’s the name of this program? i could not find it

is that the sole respurce you use? is that where you found your current employer? please suggest others if you do use others.

can you name those swiss and uk agencies?

so whats ur adivce on writing proposals

I don’t think I ever met someone I thought was really smart. That leaves me and as for myself, I started 2 companies, 1 was mildly successful.

How can they say it's a "superstar" when her paintings sell for $10-70K while a Da vinci sells for $400M. It's not like there are more than 30 of her paintings in circulation from what I could find

How do you specifically find work?

How do you specifically find work?

How do you specifically find work?

Lucky sob

this is the standard at Stripe don't act like you don't know guys

It’s not like every person institution and algorithm sells at the same time lol. Also, cascading effects.

Markets hate instability, and any price takes time to consolidate. It might never “consolidate”during high volatility.

dont see this as up as down but rather as volatility because yep it’s a volatile time

Humans are pretty dumb eh

Interesting

The answer is too complex. I can safely say everyone in this thread knows shit about finance.

Short answer is a bunch of different uncorrrlated plays/tools such as: -Volatility trades -multi leg options on any asset class really -credit markets -algorithmic hedge funds

Etc

There’s research on this. Check Florence Italian study rich bla bla bla on google . But to answer: gold, land, art

Dude people buy jets and Teslas as a business expense. super common. Dan bilzerian's ex beverly hills villa is owned by Wish as a business expense and the ceo parties there. cmon.

You can twist the villa however you want. It can be an investment through an SPV and you pay rent. To be clear, arguing (and using) something as a business expense or an investment is not fraudulent.

I don’t know who in their right mind would take out a million in salary and pay 50% of it and then buy a villa with $500k, rather than directly investing in a villa either for the appreciation itself or to use for business events, branding, whatever

And this is just one very simple way. there are countless permutations. You can go as complex as you want. You can mix and match around with credit and exotic laws and exotic countries and exotic legal structures all day long.

Sorry if reality upsets you: the world is setup by lawyers( and/politicians) for shareholders, and that's because they're the richest and capital=power.

What a massive waste taking out 14k in salary. Almost everything can arguably be a business expense. Plus, any investment, just use SVPs or other methods where you don't incur taxation: would make no sense to take them out as salary just to invest them to ur name rather than a company's name. One day you'll pay the capital gains (which can themselves me minimized) and just buy a villa for business events, a range rover to go to meetings, and so on, on a legal structure's name, that is. gl.

At the end of the day the real admission rate if you aren't ALDC or a minority is 1%. Probably lower, because many of those will be bribes. Do not fucking think for a second that a double digit percentage of those students didn't get in with bribes. I personally applied at 21 to stanford harvard yale and princeton twice and got rejected, always. that's despite raising $500k for a moonshot company and having a 1500 sat. but I might just be salty. in the end I attended a few semesters at Stanford anyway, with professors' blessings.

the landing page is bad. copy is bad. pics are bad. design is bad. looks like a screenshot from trello. fix it.

this wont fix your CA problem. but it's mandatory. your CA with $100< budget can only be solved by finding a hack. like airbnb's cofounder programmed a bot to spam craiglist in the early days of airbnb, with airbnb's listings obviously. stuff like that. good luck.

Considering they’re two companies posed to still be gigantic companies even in 50 years, I’d rather have $230b in shares of SpaceX and Tesla than $100b of random assets

Rocket power transport it’s nonsense once you consider how much time the on boarding and outboarding is

I'd build / buy and renovate about 6 2bd homes (on x3 leverage) into luxury homes in Europe and third world countries in strategic touristy places. Then live off the income of those + paying the mortgages with it, all the while traveling and living between them. Have a dog and a girlfriend and live happily ever after. I'd probably get a range rover too.

They must have spent a million on that landing page

How isn’t this downvoted into oblivion? It’s the falsest shit ever

Right but micro companies make up to $1mm a year and they’re nowhere close to $1mm. It’s like a micro micro business. 1 employee kinda thing. I would’ve expected a bigger company given how much money is lost in btc