Father-son hacker duo is helping people crack into their lost Bitcoin
hypebeast.com
hypebeast.com
They claim they’re making decent profits and have a 27% success rate. Good for them and their clients if true, but a lot of the early adopters who would require their services would presumably be tech-savvy enough to have tried some of their techniques themselves and be skeptical when expected to have “100% trust in the process”.
So I doubt we’re getting a thriving cryptocurrency recovery cottage industry any time soon.
In these contexts, there may be no tech savviness..
They also know best how the original owner thought.
A lot of people have passed on, leaving crypto behind! A non-tech savvy sort, often has zero clue about brute-forcing, and may seek a "reputable" source of assistance.
The process of cracking into a Bitcoin wallet
is simpler than it seems, though it requires a
deep understanding of how humans choose passwords
Isn't it that Bitcoin wallets produce a sequence of 12 random words? And then display those 12 words to the user to memorize?As I understand it, humans are not chosing passwords in this process.
Before BIP39, people would generate private keys by hashing passwords. Which is probably what this article is referring to.
See the "Brain Wallet" tab on bitaddress.org to see how a password-based secret key can work (please don't actually use this).
I own a very old wallet.dat[1]. It is from a time when you had to compile some C files to a command line tool which downloaded the whole blockchain [2] to your computer locally.
I'm pretty sure I have never had to specify a password (or 12 random words). I remember this because it seemed odd to me back then.
What is the easiest way to check if this wallet.dat is intact and what is in there? [3]
I'd prefer if it would be possible to check without transferring it to a service (like Coinbase, or similar), but I'm open to that, if it is safe.
[1] Actually I have two different versions of it with slightly different sizes and couldn't figure out which is the most recent.
[2] I think it must be in my backups as well, but it is probably not of much use.
[3] I have a pretty good idea what should be in there and even know the Bitcoin address used. Still I would like to verify independently if my memory serves me right and if I could transfer the Bitcoins if I wanted to.
Also don't forget you will have coins on all the forks, get those as well.
I personally would only import that wallet.dat on a fully offline/airgapped computer (which you've synched to the BTC blockchain first), prepare the transaction to move those coins to a safe address (like an hardware wallet), put that transaction on a USB stick, put that stick in an online computer and broadcast the transaction.
But first and foremost: buy a hardware wallet, learn how it works, make sure to have copies of the seed (24 words probably), "warm" you address by having a friend send you 0.01 BTC on it or something, move these coins to another address (you really want to be sure this address works and everything is smooth). This costs some money (a hardware wallet + the fees to "warm up" the addresses / test how it all works) but if you have an old wallet.dat with some or a lot of BTCs, it's worth it.
And also: move the most valuable coins first. So BTC first, then BCH, then BSV. I'm not kidding with this. So many scams with the forks / executables to synch the forks etc. Don't even think about moving the BCH/BSV etc. before having moved all the BTCs.
Re- forks: depends on what you mean by "winning". BTC "won" over BCH if you take the market price (45 K vs 500 USD) but BCH lives on. So if your wallet.dat predates that fork, you'll have both. Once again: do not ever try to move the BCH before moving the BTC... For you want to minimize the places where you import that wallet.dat for the most important coin.
Now if by "winning" you mean: one chain wins and the fork dies a sad death, the point is moot as there's no other fork/chain and hence coins there are worth 0.
If you have an old wallet.dat, you'll have coins on the BTC chain, the BCH chain, the BSV chain, the BTG Gold chain, etc.
There have been scams where people sell hardware wallets with seeds that the scammers provided, and once the victim uses the hardware wallet with the scammer-provided seed, the scammer steals the victim's coins.
Then you can load one of them into bitcoin-core wallet and you are done.
That file should be all you need, it is unencrypted and contains your bitcorns.
This is exactly what I've done with it so far, haha.
> Then you can load one of them into bitcoin-core wallet and you are done.
Sorry, I'm completely out of touch with Bitcoin by now. In the beginning there was not much info and everything was low risk anyways. Nowadays there is so much noise and I'm never sure what to trust.
When you say bitcoin-core, you mean the client I can get from https://bitcoincore.org?
If I understand the instructions correctly I should enable pruning and need to download and store about 6 GiB, but that's it.
> That file should be all you need, it is unencrypted and contains your bitcorns.
Sounds good...
The master seed and the wallet password?
How is the wallet password created?
The wallet password depends on the wallet of course. I guess you often create it yourself or it may even be optional.
I wouldn't recommend that approach for storing large amounts.
When we can help?
..
You wrote down a list of words, and the passphrase is some combination of those words
You thought you knew your password, but perhaps it involves different numbers or different capitalization than you remember
Also worth noting that the sequence of random words is a pattern that has only been standardised over the last few years. There are plenty of random zip-encoded (etc) files around from before this.
Unless the 1% is the embedded affiliate links?
There's currently a vote (https://twitter.com/theshawwn/status/1435320592350187523) but is it required for us to actually participate in the vote?
Beyond this second hand info I couldn't help you. As I suggested to another commenter, check out r/mtgoxinsolvency on reddit.
Regarding the vote, the answer is yes - but you cannot vote without having an approved rehabilitation claim, which confers a claim balance that weights the impact of your vote.