diskcat

Why is racial profiling wrong?

Aren't you just making statistical inference based on past experience?

if that is wrong then all learning is wrong.

>One potential solution is directly government funded news

Where does the government get its money to fund news? Either from the local population which is enforced support for an economically non-viable business or it can get money from other people who have no interest in the local news of another place far away.

If good local news is not profitable, then that means there is not enough interest to justify the cost of making good local news. This is not a failure of the free market to provide a critical public good. The free market is working exactly as intended, and what YOU call 'critical' public good, isn't really that critical, according to people who would actually consume said good.

And then you want the government to enforce your personal idea of what is 'critical' by forcing people to buy things they don't want.

yikes indeed

When I was at university my roommate was a rich mainlander chinese whose dad bought him an AMG mercedes. So the average car for that household was in the 100k's needless to say i wasn't driving anything near that.

>What we should really achieve is 1Gbps symmetric connections. Then the cloud is your LAN

jokes on you because my LAN is 100. also im pretty sure all 4 ports on my el cheapo switch are shared.

I thought about downloading all the youtube videos that I consider have future watching values but then i realised it would take way too much effort and storage space to download and tag/categorise them and that there is no limit to my hoarding tendency.

>This is about your guests,

who consented to the conditions of your house when entering. If he is not sure he ought to hire a civil engineer to inspect and verify the safety status of the house or ask the host to do it.

>your children,

who is your ward and is subjected to the decisions of its parent with regards to all of life choices

>the person that buys your house next,

ditto the guest situation except for buying

>the person that lives next door

this is the only legitimate case for regulation, to protect the public and/or third party.

>so they threw their (still very hot) excess soup from their pot out the window and it got all over me.

This is not a problem of housing but of manners. You can get rid of hot soup without infringing of other people's ability to walk around the public area and not be wet.

>Americans should feel nothing but disgust for most of our housing policy, and single family homes should be derided as one of single worst allocation of resources the American public makes.

In your opinion.

Some people think driving cars are bad. Some people think eating meat is bad. Some people think space heating is a waste of electricity.

Everybody seems to think their particular way of living is perfect and everybody else is either too wasteful or doesn't know how to live.

Your argument really is just "this is my subjective opinion of how to live and people who disagree are wrong".

>What I think stinks is that companies seldom thinks of accessibility.

that's because there aren't as many blind people as seeing people.

People do like to hero worship. I think it's a psychological thing.

Although I disagree with saying that you can never reach a level of somebody that's you idolise. What I observe with myself and others is that people emulate those they idolise and emulating people who are really good at something would help you improve.

Confucianism was chosen by the chinese power-that-be because he encouraged obedience and conformity. It's the reason Chinese society stagnated with a monolithic central authority. With a more libertarian approach, there would be more trade and research and given chinese huge population and food availability, they might have made a lot of technological progress and we would have a colony on Mars by now.

So in that way confucianism was similar to christianity during the dark age in that they were used by the powerful to sedate the masses.

I don't think people write lisp interpreters for performance reasons. It's more a computer science exercise which helps you understand languages better.

So basically it's a clickbait title.

People have been doing programming even though it's unfashionable forever for their interest in the activity itself.

So if these people would do it either way, what's the delta of people that you will attract when it becomes fashionable?

Gotta make sure all the sysadmins know to update and it's more likely they are on HN than checking the update server every 2 minutes.

The best thing about buying cloth online is that you buy before you put it on, thus there is an exciting wait period between when you purchased the item and it arriving in the mail. This expectant feeling is highly addictive and I believe is responsible for a lot of periodic buying that syncs with delivery time. If anybody has access to buying patterns perhaps you could confirm/deny if this is true.

>https://imgur.com/g595nJ1

It seems a lot of women have taken up 'coding' not out of interest in complex systems or solving difficult problems, the reasons that have attracted traditional 'nerds' to programming, but because 'coding' and general technology related stuff have become fashionable for women to do.

What would be the point of using microsoft's linux?

I woke up early for an 8AM class also because the prof. was way better than the 9AM one.

>Can you imagine travelling today to a foreign country ready to die for fighting oppression? I have never seen such kind of conviction in my life.

There were russians who fight in Ukraine and if you ask ISIS fighters they will tell you they are fighting to spread the-one-true-religion which is similar to fighting to spread the-one-true-ideology with minor differences.

Also fighting oppression was what was sold to US soldiers going to the Mid East at least partially.

I think there are rooms for both VR and Augmented Reality to co-exist.

Some huge percentage of all stupid arguments are made with logical fallacies, but that does not mean that any argument that uses logical fallacies are stupid. Thus the solution is not to assume that any argument using logical fallacies are wrong... though some would probably disagree.

Things like DRM can be fixed from the user demand side. If there are enough products on the market, then users can simply choose not to use products with DRM.

On the other hand, with issues like "banned encryption", if the government has its ways, there won't be any choice at all for the users.

Whether or not in the real world there are enough choices with regards to DRM and why or why not is a question for another time.

>The ancient tradition of hoaxing and playing practical jokes on the first day of April has fallen victim to China’s crackdown.

Reading that the first time I thought 'hoaxing' was a chinese word.

How weird.

There is an information asymmetry when I buy an apple at the farmer market. That doesn't mean that every time I buy an apple I'm getting ripped off by the seller.

>"Move fast, break things" doesn't work when people's lives are at stake.

No matter what you do, people's lives are at stake. Even an app that suggests which restaurant to go for dinner could cause somebody to die by suggesting a restaurant in an area with higher rate of accidents.

The problem is how little consumers have control of when it comes to healthcare. We like to hand wave and pretend that the rules of economics don't apply when it comes to healthcare so instead of having a market where a person can shop for medicine, doctor's service, equipment etc. it all is more or less just close your eyes go in the tunnel and you will be taken care of and any issue of choice with regards to money is occluded by 'universal healthcare is a human right'.

If I could go to a hospital who would then give me a brochure of all the equipments they use and I find out one of their supplier is a dodgy companies that have dodgy equipments and terrible bug-handling practice I would go to another seller just as I would a smartphone that uses a dodgy processor that is known to break.

Well the non-profit system isn't designed to allow people who embezzle money to be caught within a day or whatever. I don't think any accounting system is.

The fact that the thief is eventually caught shows that the system does work, and the amount of damage that has been done isn't fatal to the organisation.

There is going to have to be some amount of trust between the staff of an organisation and this trust can be abused to steal money, this is true in any organisation, it has nothing to do with being non-profit.

Finances are transparent to the public.

It is exactly the tremendous goodwill that attracts the thieves and scammers.

nah they just want the number for marketing purposes

>1 million tuned in to watch the unveiling and we got this list of emails to prove it

>dick@dick.penis

How cool.

Too bad I don't understand it.