Does it feature equation solving, variable elimination, etc? See for example:
738 karma · joined August 16, 2007
Does it feature equation solving, variable elimination, etc? See for example:
Good introduction to general brain health.
If you want to look up how the big time guys do it, I believe Mathematica's 'Reduce' performs full on quantifier elimination via cylindrical algebraic decomposition. There aren't many open-source implementations of CAD that I know of besides the venerable C-based QEPCAD.
PS: Big fan of your Neo4J tutorials. :-)
I work on a similar library for C# (Symbolism [1]).
Consider allowing for variable elimination in sets of equations. (See this problem for an example: https://gist.github.com/dharmatech/a14d1a29a7d4c0728d37)
----------
Supporting Emacs extensions written in Scheme is part of the goal I had in mind when I proposed this. That's the tangible benefit that we would get from Scheme support. If all Scheme does is serve as a platform for Emacs Lisp, it is no real advance.
----------
See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-09/msg00...
Hacking Emacs with Scheme is part of the plan.
https://github.com/dharmatech/box2d-lite
If you decide to add a physics engine to your project, that might give you a head start, or at least some ideas. :-)
https://github.com/priestc/Library-Transfer-Protocol
It's WinFS inspired.
If you love thinking about this sort of stuff, maybe you should get back into it! :-)
What's your opinion of file-tagging systems like Tabbles and the new file tagging feature in OS X finder? Tabbles is a far cry from full WinFS, but it enables some interesting organizational techniques. I've been using it lately and I like it. But tags don't always seem to be enough. In addition to tags, I'd like to have genuine fields.
Seems like a NoSQL database would be a decent core for a poor-man's WinFS implementation.
If C# had hygienic macros, I think the syntax of C# could have been extended for WPF specific needs, without having to resort to an XML based solution.
With a few extension methods, C# can come close and sometimes exceed XAML in its concision. I've been collecting these in a FluentWpf (https://github.com/dharmatech/FluentWpf) project on GitHub.
An example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1347219/are-there-any-flu...
Xplorer2 does "the right thing" and interlaces them.
Xplorer2 does "the right thing" and interlaces them.
sound.c:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
int main()
{
int t;
for ( t=0; ; t++ ) putchar( t*((t>>9|t>>13)&25&t>>6) );
}
Then to compile and run: $ gcc sound.c && ./a.out | aplay -FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Dragonfly BSD, BSDI, Darwin, PCBSD... ;-)
The Linux kernel isn't (at the moment) balkanized.
I'm actually in Chippewa Falls at the moment. :-)
Thanks!
> Does it depend on R6RS?
It uses syntax-case which I heard that Chicken 4.0 doesn't provide. However, the hackers on the Chicken list might be able to give you advice regarding a conversion to their macro system.